Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

+1 (binding) Thanks, Yunze On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 wrote: > > > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue > > to support this pip if the documentation

Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0

Thanks for driving the release, +1 Penghui On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:00 AM Yunze Xu wrote: > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0. It has > been about 3 months since the last release. There have been many new > features and bug fixes since then. > > Besides, from my

Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

+1 (binding) Regards, Penghui On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 wrote: > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue > to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due > to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1

[Discuss] Release Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0

I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0. It has been about 3 months since the last release. There have been many new features and bug fixes since then. Besides, from my own perspective, it's better to let Python and Node.js clients depend on this new version of C++ client.

[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level

Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding. Replied Message | From | Dave Fisher | | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | | To

Re: [VOTE] PIP-304: Make PublishContext provide the message metadata

Hi, kecona, I have left some comments on the GitHub PR. Thanks, Penghui On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:44 AM kecona wrote: > Hi all, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-304. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21311 > Discussion thread: >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-310: Support custom publish rate limiters

Replied in PR. On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 3:51 PM Girish Sharma wrote: > Hi, > Currently, there are only 2 kinds of publish rate limiters - polling based > and precise. Users have an option to use either one of them in the topic > publish rate limiter, but the resource group rate limiter only

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-309: Adding Pulsar Client Stats Reporter

I've replied in the PR it self On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:24 AM Ying wrote: > Hi dev, > > Currently, Pulsar Client can provide recorded stats for both Producer and > Consumer, but not all stats are fixed values during the statsInterval. So > start the PIP-309 to add the Pulsar Client Stats