Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-321 Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

2023-11-30 Thread Girish Sharma
Hi Xiangying, Shouldn't the solution to the issue mentioned in #21564 [0] mostly be around validating that topic level replication clusters are subset of namespace level replication clusters? It would be a completely compatible change as even today the case where a topic has a cluster not defined

Re: [Discuss] PIP-319 Unblock stuck Key_Shared subscription after consumer reconnect

2023-11-30 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
Hi Nikolai, Thanks for bringing this to the attention. I have seen multiple PIP and bug fixes for the Key-Shared subscription and I feel Key_Shared subscription dispatcher is developed with multiple fundamental issues which required to introduce scheduled-task to unblock stuck reads, introducing

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-321 Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

2023-11-30 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
Hi, I don't agree with your assumptions about allowed clusters and replication-cluster definition. Allowed clusters defined at tenant level will restrict tenants to create namespaces in regions/clusters where they are not allowed. and replication clusters will help tenant to set up full mesh

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.11.3 Candidate 1

2023-11-30 Thread Baodi Shi
Hi, yubiao. Thanks for your feedback. After discussing with Penghui, we need to wait for the Bookkeeper 4.15.5 release and then upgrade it on Pulsar. So, close this Vote first. Thanks, Baodi Shi On Nov 29, 2023 at 12:09:00, Yubiao Feng wrote: > Hi Penghui, Baodi > > - Run standalone and

Re: [VOTE] PIP-315: Configurable max delay limit for delayed delivery

2023-11-30 Thread Kevin Lu
Hi All, I am closing the vote as we have 4 binding +1's: - Yubiao Feng - Lari Hotari - Matteo Merli - Qiang Zhao And 3 non-binding +1's: - Apurva Telang - Cong Zhao - Kai Wang Thanks everyone! Regards, Kevin On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:25 PM Kai Wang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, >

Re: [Discuss] PIP-319 Unblock stuck Key_Shared subscription after consumer reconnect

2023-11-30 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Nikolai - Your email was stuck in moderation. Please subscribe to the dev list by sending an email to dev-subscr...@pulsar.apache.org and respond to the CONFIRM email. Welcome to the Pulsar community. Best, Dave > On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:30 PM, Nikolai wrote: > > Hello! > > I submitted a

[Discuss] PIP-319 Unblock stuck Key_Shared subscription after consumer reconnect

2023-11-30 Thread Nikolai
Hello! I submitted a new PIP to add a configuration option which allows to skip blocking recently joined consumers for Key_Shared subscriptions It introduces additional memory consumption, so it will be disabled by default. It would fix issues like

[Bug] std::system_error thrown during/after client->subscribe(...) when using configuration setUnAckedMessagesTimeoutMs. #358

2023-11-30 Thread Tolfree, Jack
Hello, I have filed the following issue which is an unexpected and unhandled exception that terminates our application, full details in the issue. >From looking at the code it appears the likely location for the exception is >the std::recursive_mutex. It is not clear to us why this exception

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar Client C++ 3.2.0 released

2023-11-30 Thread Karthikeyan A
Hi Team, Any updates on including transaction support on C++ client ? Thanks & Regards Karthikeyan A -Original Message- From: Yunze Xu Sent: 17 May 2023 08:33 To: dev@pulsar.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar Client C++ 3.2.0 released I have a plan to support the