All,
Looks like there is little interest in this proposal. I will wait for few
more days and close this.
Thanks for reading.
Naresh
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 8:35 PM, Zixuan Liu wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/4696 is different from this PIP.
> When using mTLS authentication, the
Cherry-picked
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:52 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Now `3.0.x` has this fix, but the newest version(`3.3.x`) doesn't contain
> this fix, which is somewhat confusing, so I want to cherry-pick it to
> `branch-3.3`.
>
> The thread will remain open for
Hi all
> Addational: I want to cherry-pick it to `branch-3.3` too.
Cherry-picked.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:53 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Addational: I want to cherry-pick it to `branch-3.3` too.
>
> The thread will remain open for 48 hours.
> If there is no objection, I will perform t
Hi all,
I'm doubting the value of the widely used Netty Recycler in Pulsar.
When I checked the recent commits today, I found even a pair of
Boolean and Integer is wrapped as a recyclable object. See
TopicExistsInfo in https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22838. It's
really a mess, especially comp
Hi Apurva,
Thanks for applying the changes to the proposal.
It looks good and given the time since it was already created, please feel
free to move to a vote at any time.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:35 PM Apurva Telang
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I had submitted PIP-337 a few mon
> But why do I find that some PRs have already been released in version v0.12.1?
Yes. This change
list(https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/compare/v0.12.1...master)
is inconsistent. Some PRs have already been released.
I have updated the milestone for version 0.13.0. And this should be
the
