+1 (binding)
-Lari
On 2024/08/01 19:56:17 Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar Helm Chart version
> 3.5.0.
>
> Release notes for 3.5.0-candidate-1:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/releases/tag/pulsar-3.5.
+1 (binding)
- verified source release file hash and signature
- ran build
- validated the Nuget package using a simple Pulsar app
Using dotnet sdk 8.0.303 (dotnet --version) on MacOS arm64.
Used the documented validation process on MacOS:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/blob/master/do
+1 (binding)
# verify checksums
sha512sum -c *.sha512
# signature OK
gpg --verify-files *.asc
Greetings
David Jensen
On 2024/08/01 19:56:17 Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar Helm Chart version
> 3.5.0.
>
> Release
+1(binding)
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
xiangying meng 于2024年8月5日周一 10:27写道：
>
> +1 nonbinding
>
> BR,
> Xiangying
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:02 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yunze
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:39 PM Jie crossover wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 nonbinding
> >
Let's ignore the last sentence I mentioned. I mentioned my suspicion
because I have concerns about the lifetime of this repo. It's
clarified privately so I'm apologizing for my conjecture about the
company. So let's focus on the topic itself.
Even without the concern about the lifetime, this repo
I just thought again about the "best practice" part. Why not
contribute it to the Apache official website
(https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site)?
Thanks,
Yunze
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:46 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> TL;DR, such a repository is not necessary to be contributed to Apache.
>
> Actually,
-1 (binding)
See reasons here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0mold5ko1z3t8pjwb46bt07o2lcqh0oy
Thanks,
Yunze
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:27 AM lushiji(apache) wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding) , we will try our best to make it happen
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:25 PM xiangying meng wrote:
>
> > Hi a
TL;DR, such a repository is not necessary to be contributed to Apache.
Actually, only the "Collect user best practices" point makes sense to
me. The reason to have so many pluggables is exactly to avoid the core
repo being not so bloated.
Yeah, OTel is a good example. But IMHO, Pulsar is far less
Hi all
I drafted a proposal to add an optional flag: disable the replicators to
automatically trigger topic creation.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23124
I'm looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
