Bump. Could anyone help vote?
Thanks,
Yunze
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 6:34 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for PIP-418: Determine the behaviors for
> components that rely on BookKeeper when BookKeeper is not used
>
> - Proposal link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pu
The document has been updated, please review it again.
For now, let's not consider adding the "index" to the parameters.
Thanks,
sinan
xiangying meng 于2025年6月10日周二 12:03写道：
> Hello, Sinan,
>
> I hold the opposite view on this matter. There is no need to provide
> the index parameter for this
Hi, Pulsar Community,
I opened a new pip to enable consumer throttling and accurate
unacknowledged message tracking for exclusive and failover subscriptions.
I'm looking
forward to your suggestions!
link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24400
Thanks,
Minjian cai
Thanks for the suggestions, I'll add them to the PIP.
Thanks,
Ran Gao
On 2025/06/03 00:15:58 PengHui Li wrote:
> Thanks for the proposal.
>
> The motivation looks good to me, users can connect to their preferred or
> customized schema registry with this proposal, which can get rid of the
> limit
???The vote to release Apache DotPulsar 4.3.0 has passed.
The vote PASSED with xxx binding +1 and 0 -1 votes:
Binding votes:
+1 binding
Lari Hotari
Daniel Blankensteiner
David Jensen
???
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/809or6mtkh01hhzfz82bgylkqck5yjxt
Thank you to all the above
+1 (binding)
On 2025/06/04 10:10:25 David Jensen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate for the version 4.3.0, as
> follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> DotPulsar's KEYS file cont
