Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-371 Support for request-reply model that implements RPC calls

2024-08-08 Thread naresh
+1 to this if can be natively supported in pulsar(across programming languages). Its a useful capability in messaging. https://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/patterns/messaging/RequestReply.html On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 9:05 AM, SiNan Liu wrote: > The focus is not on RPC, but on the Reques

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-361: Support URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token building from client's X.509 Certificate SAN Extensions

2024-06-27 Thread naresh
All, Looks like there is little interest in this proposal. I will wait for few more days and close this. Thanks for reading. Naresh On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 8:35 PM, Zixuan Liu wrote: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/4696 is different from this PIP. > When using mTLS authenti

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-361: Support URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token building from client's X.509 Certificate SAN Extensions

2024-06-21 Thread naresh
this PIP as well as above ticket. Are you suggesting the pulsar community wont benefit from this and host it in other git repo as separate plugin ? Thanks Naresh On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 7:54 PM, Zixuan Liu wrote: > Hi naresh, > > Right now the Pulsar can only get the role from a common n

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-361: Support URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token building from client's X.509 Certificate SAN Extensions

2024-06-20 Thread naresh
Can someone help with this ? On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 1:54 PM naresh wrote: > Hello, > > This is my PIP Request at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22917 > > If this PIP is acceptable, i am considering the following for the code > changes: > >

[DISCUSS] PIP-361: Support URI, DNS, RID, IP based Token building from client's X.509 Certificate SAN Extensions

2024-06-15 Thread naresh
. Create a new class org.apache.pulsar.broker.authentication.AuthenticationProviderTlsSan thats backward compatible with current implementation Currently, I have made code changes on my local to support option-2. Before I go far, requesting some feedback on the overall proposal. Thanks Naresh

[jira] [Resolved] (PULSAR-5) Update protobuf version in pom.xml

2020-01-19 Thread Naresh Bhat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Naresh Bhat resolved PULSAR-5. -- Resolution: Invalid The pulser project is no more uses the jira tickets to track the issues. [~sijie

[jira] [Commented] (PULSAR-5) Update protobuf version in pom.xml

2020-01-19 Thread Naresh Bhat (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17019242#comment-17019242 ] Naresh Bhat commented on PULSAR-5: -- [~sijie]Thank you very much for the quick resp

[jira] [Created] (PULSAR-5) Update protobuf version in pom.xml

2020-01-19 Thread Naresh Bhat (Jira)
Naresh Bhat created PULSAR-5: Summary: Update protobuf version in pom.xml Key: PULSAR-5 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR-5 Project: Pulsar Issue Type: Improvement