[DISCUSS] Delete unused util class ConcurrentSortedLongPairSet.

anymore. If you have any concern on this pr, feel free to leave comments. Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled)

[DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder.

Hi all, I would like to start a discussion to cherry-pick PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder into branch-3.0, branch-3.2, and branch-3.3. This PIP introduce a new load balance algorithm with higher bundle switching accuracy and stablity. Thanks, Wenzhi Feng.

[DISCUSS] One single TC unavailable cause transactional throughput down to 0.

enzhi Feng(thetumbled)

Re: [VOTE] PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder.

ing) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 8:39?6?2AM Kai Wang wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks > > Kai > > > > On 2024/06/26 03:00:02 thetumbled wrote: > > > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > > I would like t

[VOTE] PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder.

Hi, Pulsar Community. I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder. Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22946 Implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22949 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled).

[DISCUSS] PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder.

prove out my analysis and post them in the PR, hope them will be helpful to you! link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22946 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled)

Re: [VOTE] PIP-358: let resource weight work for OverloadShedder, LeastLongTermMessageRate, ModularLoadManagerImpl.

The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now. Votes: - Yubiao Feng(binding) - guo jiwei(binding) - Yunze Xu(binding) Thank you all for verifying and voting! Wenzhi Feng.

[DISCUSS] PIP-358: let resource weight work for OverloadShedder, LeastLongTermMessageRate, ModularLoadManagerImpl.

Feng(thetumbled)

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

Feng > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:33?6?2AM thetumbled wrote: > > > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-357: Correct the conf > > name in load balance module. > > Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/2282

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

> If the existing user wants to move to the new configuration name, they > should > set the old one to -1 or just delete it. > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:15?6?2AM Kai Wang wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > Thank you, > >

[VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

Hi, Pulsar Community. I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module. Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22823 Implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22824 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled).

[DISCUSS] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

Hi, Pulsar Community. I open a new PIP for correcting the conf name of load balance module. link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22823 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled)

RE: [DISCUSS] Make the default value of deprecated loadBalancerMemoryResourceWeight to 0.

BTW, this is the related PR for this discussion: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22801. On 2024/05/31 03:16:37 thetumbled wrote: > Hi, Pulsar Community. > I want to start a discussion about changing the default value of deprecated loadBalancerMemoryResourceWeight to 0. W

[DISCUSS] Make the default value of deprecated loadBalancerMemoryResourceWeight to 0.

eight to 0, in such way we can avoid the interference from the memory usage and waiting for Lari's enhancement. Looking for your feedback! Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled).

Re: [VOTE] PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl

The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now. Votes: - Yunze Xu(binding) - Kai Wang(non-binding) - PengHui Li(binding) - guo jiwei(binding) Thank you all for verifying and voting! Wenzhi Feng.(thetumbled) On 2024/05/27 08:09:10 guo jiwei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > >

[VOTE] PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl

Hi, Pulsar Community. I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl. Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22765 Implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22753 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled).

[DISCUSS] PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl

Hi, Pulsar Community. I open a new PIP for relieving the zk pressure posed by ModularLoadManagerImpl. link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22765 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled)

Re: [VOTE] PIP-347: add role field in consumer's stat

The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now. Votes: - Tao Jiuming (non-binding) - Enrico Olivelli (binding) - Penghui Li (binding) - Zixuan Liu (non-binding) - Zike Yang (binding) Thank you all for verifying and voting! Wenzhi Feng.(thetumbled) On 2024/05/14 11:20:35 Zike Yang wrote

[VOTE] PIP-347: add role field in consumer's stat

Hi, Pulsar Community. I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-347: add role field in consumer's stat. Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22564 Implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22562 Thanks, Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled).