+1
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 09:33 Zike Yang ha
scritto:
> Thanks for your PR. I think this looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:23 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
> >
> > I totally agree.
> > There has been little API Design error
Thanks for your PR. I think this looks good to me.
Thanks,
Zike Yang
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:23 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> I totally agree.
> There has been little API Design error to add that "throws" clause.
>
> Thanks for the initiative
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore
I totally agree.
There has been little API Design error to add that "throws" clause.
Thanks for the initiative
Enrico
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 09:16 ha scritto:
>
> Hello, everyone
>
> I submitted this PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19356 to discuss if
> we can accept
Hello, everyone
I submitted this PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19356 to discuss if
we can accept moving this checked exception into the builder to avoid adding
more useless try-catch blocks.
In practice, we should create the new transaction like this:
```java
final