Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-181: Provide new load balance placement strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy

2022-07-02 Thread Haiting Jiang
PR #16319 does the similar thing. Just sync the info to this mail thread. IMO, the real problem is the definition of broker load (aka resource usage) is not consistent in bundle shedder and bundle assignment. The load balance module should have a better abstraction that contains both shedding

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-181: Provide new load balance placement strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy

2022-07-01 Thread Qiang Huang
Thank you. I resolved. PTAL. Heesung Sohn 于2022年7月1日周五 02:35写道: > Hi 叶韵, > The proposal looks good to me, and I left comments in the PR, > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16281/. > > Regards, > Heesung > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:39 AM 叶韵 wrote: > > > Hi Pulsar community: > > I open a p

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-181: Provide new load balance placement strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy

2022-06-30 Thread Heesung Sohn
Hi 叶韵, The proposal looks good to me, and I left comments in the PR, https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16281/. Regards, Heesung On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:39 AM 叶韵 wrote: > Hi Pulsar community: > I open a pip to discuss "Shadow Topic, an alternative way to support > readonly topic ownership.

[DISCUSS] PIP-181: Provide new load balance placement strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy

2022-06-29 Thread 叶韵
Hi Pulsar community: I open a pip to discuss "Shadow Topic, an alternative way to support readonly topic ownership." Proposal Link: - issue link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16274 - pr link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16281 --- ## Motivation The modular load manager,