I made a PR for this idea, see https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17129
Please help review if you have time, thanks!
Zixuan
Zixuan Liu 于2022年8月15日周一 13:18写道：
> Thank Qiang for your explanation!
>
> Qiang Huang 于2022年8月14日周日 12:15写道：
>
>> LGTM. They are very similar.
>> The OpenJDK provides
Thank Qiang for your explanation!
Qiang Huang 于2022年8月14日周日 12:15写道：
> LGTM. They are very similar.
> The OpenJDK provides source-code, and the Temurin JDK provides builds of
> the source code.
> I would like to point out that they have different licenses.
> - The OpenJDK implementation is licen
LGTM. They are very similar.
The OpenJDK provides source-code, and the Temurin JDK provides builds of
the source code.
I would like to point out that they have different licenses.
- The OpenJDK implementation is licensed under the GPL-2.0-only with a
linking exception. [0]
- The Eclipse Temurin™ pr
Hi tison,
Great catch!
The Temurin JDK is OpenJDK distribution from Adoptium, the old JDK from
Ubuntu, they should all be built on the OpenJDK open source project, so I
think should be fully compatible.
Each Temurin release has passed the relevant Oracle Java Compatibility Kit
(JCK) to demonstra
+1
Thanks for bringing this topic :)
In Pulsar usages, these two distributions should not be quite different.
Did you investigate the compatibility more?
Best,
tison.
Zixuan Liu 于2022年8月12日周五 15:17写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed we are using OpenJDK in our Docker image, I suggest that we
> switc
The following versions need to be modified: 2.11, 2.10, 2.9, 2.8, and 2.7.
Zixuan Liu 于2022年8月12日周五 15:17写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed we are using OpenJDK in our Docker image, I suggest that we
> switch to the Temurin JDK, because our CI runs on the Temurin JDK, we need
> to keep the same JDK eve
Hi all,
I noticed we are using OpenJDK in our Docker image, I suggest that we
switch to the Temurin JDK, because our CI runs on the Temurin JDK, we need
to keep the same JDK everywhere to avoid unexpected problems. Thanks, Zixuan
