Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-24 Thread Christophe Bornet
Thanks to you all, Closing this vote with 8 +1s (4 bindings and 4 non-bindings) and no -1s. We'll adjust the naming during the implementation. Thanks, Christophe Le mar. 23 août 2022 à 07:04, Michael Marshall a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > I have some thoughts on naming, too. > > My preference

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-22 Thread Michael Marshall
+1 (binding) I have some thoughts on naming, too. My preference is to call it a “mapper function”, though I think “decorator function” is a good name too. My concern with the preprocessing (and the correlated future postprocessing) name is that it's not clear to me what the "processing" step is.

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-16 Thread Lari Hotari
+1 (binding) Good proposal. My only comment is about the naming. Instead of calling it a "preprocessing function" or "extra function", I'd propose calling it "decorator function". -Lari On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote: > Hi, Pulsar community, > > I'd like to start a vote on

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-16 Thread Qiang Huang
+1 (non binding) Nicolò Boschi 于2022年8月16日周二 17:28写道: > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks, > Nicolò Boschi > > > Il giorno mer 10 ago 2022 alle ore 01:34 Neng Lu ha > scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > Not sure if this is too late or not, I replied in the discussion thread > > about some thinking. > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-16 Thread Nicolò Boschi
+1 (non binding) Thanks, Nicolò Boschi Il giorno mer 10 ago 2022 alle ore 01:34 Neng Lu ha scritto: > Hi, > > Not sure if this is too late or not, I replied in the discussion thread > about some thinking. > Whether we tweak the sink connector or we allow a flexible and general > function

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-09 Thread Neng Lu
Hi, Not sure if this is too late or not, I replied in the discussion thread about some thinking. Whether we tweak the sink connector or we allow a flexible and general function creation. On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 5:03 PM mattison chao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Mattison > > On Tue, 2

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-01 Thread mattison chao
+1 (non-binding) Best, Mattison On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 01:56, Dave Fisher wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote: > > Hi, Pulsar community, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function > > > > You can find the proposal at

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-08-01 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding) On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote: > Hi, Pulsar community, > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function > > You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and > the discussion thread at >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-07-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (binding) Thank you I am sure that this feature will have a huge impact on Pulsar IO users Enrico Il giorno gio 28 lug 2022 alle ore 12:39 Christophe Bornet ha scritto: > > Hi, Pulsar community, > > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function > > You can find the

[VOTE] PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function

2022-07-28 Thread Christophe Bornet
Hi, Pulsar community, I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and the discussion thread at https://lists.apache.org/thread/qn59jwn47w9ngxpkvq3kswbl1y882jth. The vote will stay open for at least