Thank you everyone for taking time to respond. I guess we will wait
till the gitbox integration to complete.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> I think the gitbox integration is still not active. If I go on
> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
>
> I can see that :
>
> According
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user merlimat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521
I think if we ever need to do a 1.18.1, this fix should be included.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user merlimat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521
I think if we ever need to do a 1.18.1, this fix should be included.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
I think the gitbox integration is still not active. If I go on
https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
I can see that :
According to LDAP, you will have access to the following repositories:
bookkeeper:
No repositories for the bookkeeper project served from gitbox yet...
incubator:
No repositories for
Hi Dave,
> Everyone who has provided an iCLA and has setup their Apache ID to point
to their GitHub ID should have Write access as you see.
Actually, I have verified that my Apache ID is pointing to GitHub-ID
(username) and I have also submitted the iCLA earlier. I think it's same
for Andrews as w
Hi Andrews,
> On Jun 22, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Sahaya Andrews wrote:
>
> When can we expect the setup to be finalized? We are still waiting to
> get write access. Some of us who were part of the dev group in the old
> repo got write access automatically. But the rest who were part of
> admin group d
GitHub user merlimat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/522
Reduce default producer queue size from 30K to 1K also for Python
### Motivation
Since it the producer queue size was reduced for C++ and Java producer, we
should keep it the sam
Github user rdhabalia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123651843
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user rdhabalia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123651843
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user merlimat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123651694
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user merlimat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123651694
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user merlimat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123651279
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user merlimat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123651279
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user rdhabalia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123650995
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
Github user rdhabalia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521#discussion_r123650995
--- Diff:
pulsar-zookeeper/src/main/java/com/yahoo/pulsar/zookeeper/ZooKeeperServerAspect.java
---
@@ -31,15 +31,26 @@
*/
@Aspect
GitHub user merlimat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/521
Fixed problem in starting ZK server for standalone mode
### Motivation
In 1.18 release there is a problem in starting the standalone broker.
```
$ bin/pulsar standalo
Hi Andrews,
I completely understand your excitement, which s a good thing!
But one of the things you'll learn during incubation is the need to be patient.
The infrastructure team has a lot of podlings, TLPs, and other matters to
attend to in a largely volunteer organization. You'll also likely
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/520
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/520
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
GitHub user nkurihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/520
Enable to configure webSocketServiceEnabled on Standalone
### Motivation
When standalone mode, WebSocket service is always enabled.
I think it should be configured by `standal
When can we expect the setup to be finalized? We are still waiting to
get write access. Some of us who were part of the dev group in the old
repo got write access automatically. But the rest who were part of
admin group did not :)
Andrews.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> A
We have merged the pull request
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/519 with the license
header change.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> Ok, got it :)
>
> I've closed the PR.
>
> For the record, the steps I did to change the headers were:
>
> 1. Modify "src/lic
Github user jai1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jai1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user rdhabalia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/519
Updates headers with ASF source files header
### Motivation
#518 extending PR:
Updated license headers and the license template file that is used to
validated the license in
Ok, got it :)
I've closed the PR.
For the record, the steps I did to change the headers were:
1. Modify "src/license-header.txt" with standard ASF header
2. mvn license:format
Matteo
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:51 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Matteo,
>
> No - the license header changes mus
Github user bobbeyreese commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/437
My previous concerns were address in #460 but the Travis build is failing a
test that succeeds for me locally due to timeout.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user merlimat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user rdhabalia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/518
@merlimat In mail discussion it says:
> The Yahoo copyright can only be removed by a Yahoo employee as shown by
the SGA.
Should one of us create this PR?
---
If your projec
Matteo,
The Yahoo copyright can only be removed by a Yahoo employee as shown by the SGA.
Regards,
Dave
> On Jun 22, 2017, at 10:54 AM, merlimat wrote:
>
> GitHub user merlimat opened a pull request:
>
>https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/518
>
>Updates headers with ASF so
GitHub user merlimat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/518
Updates headers with ASF source files header.
### Motivation
Updated license headers and the license template file that is used to
validated the license in source files.
You can
Hi Matteo,
No - the license header changes must be done by someone from Yahoo. That's ASF
policy that the changes are done from the SGA org.
Package names are ok.
Regards,
Dave
> On Jun 22, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> I'm going to start to send out PRs to update the license he
I'm going to start to send out PRs to update the license headers and to
rename the Package names.
I believe that the renaming should not pose a big trouble on the currently
opened PRs, since git is able to follow that without conflicts.
For the license headers, there might be some conflicts mark
37 matches
Mail list logo
