: [DISCUSSION] Podling name search
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:48 PM Jerry Peng
wrote:
> I completely agree with want Matteo said. Changing the name will
> effectively kill the project. Changing the project will probably also
> implying changing the package names in the code itself which
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:48 PM Jerry Peng
wrote:
> I completely agree with want Matteo said. Changing the name will
> effectively kill the project. Changing the project will probably also
> implying changing the package names in the code itself which will be a
> breaking and non-backwards comp
I completely agree with want Matteo said. Changing the name will
effectively kill the project. Changing the project will probably also
implying changing the package names in the code itself which will be a
breaking and non-backwards compatible change. Any reasonable developer
will be turned off
+1 for using the name "Apache Pulsar".
- Sijie
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:01 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> As some in Pulsar community are already aware, one of the pending
> tasks for Pulsar project to complete the "name search task".
>
> A JIRA task was opened to collect facts around usages of Pulsa
I also wanted to note that Yahoo legal and OSS department did conduct a
rigorous validation process for the name, before open sourcing "Yahoo
Pulsar" in Sept 2016.
Of course that won't guarantee anything, but the name wasn't decided
without putting some thought on it.
Matteo
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018
In my view, even if there were a 100% chance to be forced to change name in
4 years, it would still make sense to change it then, rather than now.
Changing it now, would mean to effectively kill the project, under any
plausible scenarios.
Matteo
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:52 PM P. Taylor Goetz wr
I’d suggest thinking long and hard about this. Would you rather deal with a
name change now, or 4 years from now as a TLP?
It may sound like a remote possibility, but trust me, these things can and do
happen.
-Taylor
> On Jun 7, 2018, at 8:01 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> As some in Pulsar c
+1 for continuing to use the name “Apache Pulsar”.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Sanjeev Kulkarni
wrote:
> +1 for continuing to use the name “Apache Pulsar”.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:01 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> > As some in Pulsar community are already aware, one of the pending
> > ta
+1 for continuing to use the name “Apache Pulsar”.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:01 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> As some in Pulsar community are already aware, one of the pending
> tasks for Pulsar project to complete the "name search task".
>
> A JIRA task was opened to collect facts around usages of Pu
