[qdox-dev] [jira] Commented: (QDOX-148) Allow to disable usage of "default" class loaders

2009-02-22 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QDOX-148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=166628#action_166628 ] Robert Scholte commented on QDOX-148: - I agree we need to have control over the classloaders. I'm t

[qdox-dev] [jira] Commented: (QDOX-148) Allow to disable usage of "default" class loaders

2009-02-22 Thread Benjamin Bentmann (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QDOX-148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=166618#action_166618 ] Benjamin Bentmann commented on QDOX-148: While the try/catch is surely an improvement, I still

Re: [qdox-dev] 1.9 release ?

2009-02-22 Thread Mauro Talevi
Paul Hammant wrote: What schedule would we be happier with ? Once a month, if we there are changes ? Or six weeks min, instead of four ? 4-6 weeks is a good release lifecycle. Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list, please

Re: [qdox-dev] 1.9 release ?

2009-02-22 Thread Paul Hammant
What schedule would we be happier with ? Once a month, if we there are changes ? Or six weeks min, instead of four ? Regards, - Paul On Feb 21, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Mauro Talevi wrote: Robert Scholte wrote: Is there a reason for a quick release right now or is it just to keep the train moving