Aidan Skinner wrote:
I think the API docs don't need the license as they're generated. I'm
not sure about the Makefile.ams but they probably do.
Done.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Also bin/qpidd doesn't have the apache header or the various qpid?.conf
files.
I've added the license to the conf files and the qpidd init script and a
.cpp that was missing it. Also fixed a minor typo
Test failure : ReturnUnroutableMandatoryMessageTest
---
Key: QPID-1534
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1534
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java Tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Ritchie updated QPID-1534:
-
Attachment:
TEST-org.apache.qpid.server.exchange.ReturnUnroutableMandatoryMessageTest.txt
Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner reassigned QPID-1469:
---
Assignee: Martin Ritchie (was: Aidan Skinner)
- Martin for review
I'm trying to figure out if there is a relatively easy way to generate
more useful Python API docs.
Many of the methods you actually want to use are created when loading
the spec files at run time, and do not show up in the pydoc. That makes
it pretty hard to know what methods you can call by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Gemmell updated QPID-1533:
-
Attachment: QPID-1533_16dec2008.patch
I have made a patch, QPID-1533_16dec2008.patch which
Hi All,
Here is the status on the licensing issues reported by RAT.
Java
87 files are reported by RAT. They includes the various verify.in files used
for example automation, the test profiles and the various property files.
All java source files and executables have the proper ASF
There are still outstanding issues within the .NET client.
I will work with Arnaud tomorrow to resolve these issues.
Regards,
Rajith.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
Here is the status on the licensing issues reported by RAT.
Java
On Monday 15 December 2008 11:53:31 pm Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the status on the licensing issues reported by RAT.
Java
87 files are reported by RAT. They includes the various verify.in files
used for example automation, the test profiles and the various property
10 matches
Mail list logo