Andrea,
Please add each additional project used to the notice file for QMan /
Java the license it uses. This
will make life easier when we get to release time.
Carl.
agazzar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: agazzarini
Date: Wed Jan 14 23:17:57 2009
New Revision: 734619
URL:
Ok, then go for it - pick one :-)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.comwrote:
Personally I don't think it is a big deal, we can try something, if we
don't like it we change it.
Carl.
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Now, a work of caution on this ...
Last time
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
If the features on the page for M5 are more, shall we say, aspirational -
let's use them as a roadmap for 2009.
I'm certainly keen on understanding how our roadmap will take us to the
point where all Qpid
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
If the features on the page for M5 are more, shall we say, aspirational
-
let's use them as a roadmap for 2009.
I'm certainly keen on
Hi Carl I saw that running the build-release-bin task on QMan a notice
file is copied under the (qman) root release folder but is the Qpid
(java) notice file.
Is that right or I should create a dedicated one for QMan? Note that
the same applies for readme
Regards
Andrea
On 1/15/09, Carl Trieloff
Let's try to narrow this list down a bit for a target M5 timescale ?
As we've chatted about, I agree we should timebox our releases. But I think
the Doctor might struggle with that lot before end March :-)
Bfn,
Marnie
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org wrote:
On
And I really think we should bin this silly Mx release numbering convention:-)
+1
For 5 I vote we drop the M.
Carl.
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/1/15 Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
If the features on the page for M5 are more, shall we say, aspirational -
let's use them as a roadmap for 2009.
I'm certainly keen on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Gemmell updated QPID-53:
---
Attachment: qpid_logo_medium.png
qpid_logo_small.png
I thought number 3 was being a bit
I thought number 3 was being a bit let down by its colour scheme, so what
better way to inject some and a bit of Apache at the same time...my non-voting
opinion on the logo issue :P
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12398037/qpid_logo_small.png
I don’t particularly like any of the Q's (though that one would look nicer with
a smaller/no gap at the bottom I think) so I didn’t bother trying it with
different versions.
I just figured that of the few designs that don’t have any real colour, 3 is
the nicest and definitely worth
Using Qpid / AMQP with JMS
http://rajith.2rlabs.com/2008/06/08/axis2synapse-amqp-support-via-jms-transport-using-apache-qpid/
Using Qpid / AMQP with Axis2
http://wso2.org/library/3663
Would it be useful to create a page where we link useful and
informative blog posting about Qpid?
12 matches
Mail list logo
