i have try to tested link two broker in one mahcine.
1. first using c++ declare_queue create two queue names message_queue and
two exchange amp.direct for each broker.
sample:
#./declare_queue 127.0.0.1:10003 and #./declare_queue 127.0.0.1:10004
2. the queue and exchange has created . i runnin
coping user list
Jonathan Robie wrote:
Rafi and I improved the Python API docs.
See if you like them better now - I think they are less cluttered and
more useful:
http://qpid.apache.org/docs/api/python/html/index.html
Jonathan
--
Rafi and I improved the Python API docs.
See if you like them better now - I think they are less cluttered and
more useful:
http://qpid.apache.org/docs/api/python/html/index.html
Jonathan
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Imple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Huston updated QPID-1641:
---
Attachment: qpid1641-1.diff
Diffs attached for resolving os.uname
> python tools need porting to nati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670934#action_12670934
]
Steve Huston commented on QPID-1641:
Are you working on this actively, Cliff? I've playe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael j. goulish updated QPID-1650:
-
Attachment: separate_ClusterFixture.diff
> in src/tests, separate the code for ClusterFixt
in src/tests, separate the code for ClusterFixture
---
Key: QPID-1650
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1650
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++ Broke
We currently are using 2 different URL formats in Qpid, we need to get that
sorted out and aligned with the AMQP spec.
The attached is a proposal, if we get agreement that its' good for Qpid then
I'll submit it to the AMQP working group.
All improvements welcome!
* Proposal to unify Qpid and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-1649:
---
Attachment: FailoverExchange.patch
The following approach was taking in the attached patch
The
Add FailoverExchange support to the java client
---
Key: QPID-1649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1649
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Java Client
A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu reassigned QPID-1609:
--
Assignee: Rafael H. Schloming (was: Rajith Attapattu)
> Heartbeat support for java clie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajith Attapattu updated QPID-1640:
---
Attachment: FailoverTest.patch
> Improve existing/add more failover tests
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670831#action_12670831
]
Robert Gemmell commented on QPID-1648:
--
I have a functional setup for this, currently d
Enable live reconfiguration of Log4J settings for the Java broker via JMX
-
Key: QPID-1648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1648
Project: Qpid
Issue Type:
The core Eclipse plugin that it is based on is part of the build output, but
the rest of it isn't...if people feel adventurous they can put it into the
Eclipse IDE and use it though :P
The reason I did that was because that is what the module folder it lives in
is really for, the plugin, and it di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670807#action_12670807
]
Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-1641:
---
I don't currently have access to a wi
>From what I can see the source of peoples differing feelings isn't
over arbitrary versioning conventions, but rather over the direction
and state of the project as a whole. I think everyone actually has a
relatively similar notion of what 1.x vs 0.x means, but they're simply
applying it to with di
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Thanks to Rafi & Rajith for adding their items into M5.
On the C++ side, it looks like Gordon's task for QPID-530 is the only
item
for M5. I can't imagine that's correct ?
If this is correct, I'd propose we descope the C++ component from the M5
re
Headers exchange examples
-
Key: QPID-1647
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1647
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java Client
Affects Versions: M4
Reporter: Ar
[x] 0.5
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:06 AM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: version number proposal
>
>
>
> let's bring this thread back on topic
> straw poll, select one.
>
> [ ]
[x] 0.5
Regards,
Rajith
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
> let's bring this thread back on topic
> straw poll, select one.
>
> [ ] 0.5
> [ ] 1.5
>
> Both work, take your pick. many OS projects use pre 1 numbering and others
> use bigger numbers.
>
>
>
>
>
[x] 1.5
Marnie
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
> let's bring this thread back on topic
> straw poll, select one.
>
> [ ] 0.5
> [ ] 1.5
>
> Both work, take your pick. many OS projects use pre 1 numbering and others
> use bigger numbers.
>
>
>
>
> ---
Martin Ritchie wrote:
2009/2/5 Rafael Schloming :
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/2/3 Rafael Schloming :
I could buy into s/M/0./ for everything (but not s/M/1./). I know some
people are opposed to releasing 0.x versions for marketing reasons,
but that essentially removes any useful information from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway resolved QPID-1618.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Commited the code change in revision 741123 based on manual testing.
Unit test need
let's bring this thread back on topic
straw poll, select one.
[ ] 0.5
[ ] 1.5
Both work, take your pick. many OS projects use pre 1 numbering and
others use bigger numbers.
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway reassigned QPID-1618:
-
Assignee: Alan Conway
> unacked persistent messages don't get to messageStore of newbie cluster
>
2009/2/5 Rafael Schloming :
> Robert Greig wrote:
>>
>> 2009/2/3 Rafael Schloming :
>>
I could buy into s/M/0./ for everything (but not s/M/1./). I know some
people are opposed to releasing 0.x versions for marketing reasons,
but that essentially removes any useful information from t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael j. goulish updated QPID-1618:
-
Attachment: qpid_1618.diff
> unacked persistent messages don't get to messageStore of newb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael j. goulish updated QPID-1618:
-
Attachment: (was: qpid_1618.diff)
> unacked persistent messages don't get to messageSt
That's great! :)
Let me know if he needs some help...(the documentation is in progress...)
Regards,
Andrea
2009/2/5 Lahiru Gunathilake
> Hi Andrea,
>
> I have already pointed one user to QMan Admin Console.
>
> Cheers
>
> Lahiru
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Carl Trieloff
> wrote:
>
> >
>
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/2/3 Rafael Schloming :
I could buy into s/M/0./ for everything (but not s/M/1./). I know some
people are opposed to releasing 0.x versions for marketing reasons,
but that essentially removes any useful information from the rev.
I agree, and personally I don't think mar
Hi Andrea,
I have already pointed one user to QMan Admin Console.
Cheers
Lahiru
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
> Coping to users list if anyone wants to play with it and provide feedback
> prior to M5 release. It is really
> worth playing with !!
>
> Carl.
>
> Andrea G
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
I would like to be the release manager for our next release...
thanks
Carl.
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qp
Yes - this is really good.
Jonathan
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Looks much better & more coherent as a Qpid product.
Thanks,
Marnie
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Marnie,
thx for edits on download page. I added two columns to try make the page
clearer, take a look
C
A little while ago I asked for input from everyone that wanted to make
points or provide quotes for our graduation press release. Thanks to all
those that did. Here is the draft that has been created. please let me
know if you want me to add any more points, or have corrections. I built
it fr
Looks much better & more coherent as a Qpid product.
Thanks,
Marnie
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
> Marnie,
>
> thx for edits on download page. I added two columns to try make the page
> clearer, take a look
>
> Carl.
>
> ---
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> Would be good to pull together the notes, tasks and advice from the
> previous RMs. I know we started such a page back with M1 but my wiki
> searching fu is not strong today as I cannot find the page.
http://qpid.apache.org/qpidreleaseproc
It's the Eclipse JMX Management Console, but we don't *think* it's in the
download package, back to the debates about output from build being our dist
:-)
Marnie
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
>
> How should I list the eclipse management tool on the download page -- does
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> Aidan Skinner wrote:
>> Having the choice would be good, I'd rather stick with M5 than 1.5,
>> but would prefer 0.5 to either.
>
> Clearly everyone is not going to agree on this eg. Rob Grieg feels one way
> you the other. It is going
> to c
How should I list the eclipse management tool on the download page --
does it have a name?
Carl.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Marnie,
thx for edits on download page. I added two columns to try make the
page clearer, take a look
Carl.
---
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Shall I make my proposal again... v1.5 for the next release? or shall I
create a vote with 1.5 & 0.5
and people can only vote for one of them
Having the choice would be good, I'd rather stick with M5 than 1.5
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
Once we have a Top 10 then we can decide if we want to:
a) Vote on a winner takes all
b) Take the top n for use.
c) Reopen the suggestions.
+10
Coping to users list if anyone wants to play with it and provide
feedback prior to M5 release. It is really
worth playing with !!
Carl.
Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
Hi all, QMan Admin console has been submitted.
It lets you :
1) Connect with a broker;
2) List all connected brokers;
3) View manag
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> Shall I make my proposal again... v1.5 for the next release? or shall I
> create a vote with 1.5 & 0.5
> and people can only vote for one of them
Having the choice would be good, I'd rather stick with M5 than 1.5,
but would prefer 0.5 to e
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Thanks to Rafi & Rajith for adding their items into M5.
On the C++ side, it looks like Gordon's task for QPID-530 is the only item
for M5. I can't imagine that's correct ?
If this is correct, I'd propose we descope the C++ component from the M5
release plans and work aro
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/2/3 Rafael Schloming :
I could buy into s/M/0./ for everything (but not s/M/1./). I know some
people are opposed to releasing 0.x versions for marketing reasons,
but that essentially removes any useful information from the rev.
I agree, and personally I don't
Marnie McCormack wrote:
Anyone know how to divert JIRA emails from the old incubator list to the new
dev list address ?
Marnie
I asked infra, they say they forward and did not seem inclined to update it.
Carl.
-
Apache Q
Hi,
I would like to be the release manager for our next release... I
tentatively say M5 as I know the version number discussion is still on
going.
Would be good to pull together the notes, tasks and advice from the
previous RMs. I know we started such a page back with M1 but my wiki
searching fu
Marnie,
thx for edits on download page. I added two columns to try make the
page clearer, take a look
Carl.
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr.
Anyone know how to divert JIRA emails from the old incubator list to the new
dev list address ?
Marnie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Ritchie updated QPID-1605:
-
Component/s: Java Tests
> intermittent failures of the failover related QueueBrowser* tests
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670705#action_12670705
]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-1608:
--
How about adding a test to ensure this doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670701#action_12670701
]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-1612:
--
We should also make the ... of the default Prin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12670688#action_12670688
]
Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-1581:
Wiki page here, in case anyone else looking
Thanks to Rafi & Rajith for adding their items into M5.
On the C++ side, it looks like Gordon's task for QPID-530 is the only item
for M5. I can't imagine that's correct ?
If this is correct, I'd propose we descope the C++ component from the M5
release plans and work around the Java/QMan packages
55 matches
Mail list logo
