Re: C++ Broker: segfault in TopicExchange::isBound()

2009-06-30 Thread Carl Trieloff
Rob, are you able to do a 'thread apply all bt' on the core. That will allow us to reason through your theory with you Carl. rsprin...@mail.etinternational.com wrote: All, We've been using Qpid M4 and 0.5 internally, both with C++, and have been seeing occasional segfaults within the broke

C++ Broker: segfault in TopicExchange::isBound()

2009-06-30 Thread rspringer
All, We've been using Qpid M4 and 0.5 internally, both with C++, and have been seeing occasional segfaults within the broker. They all seem to occur inside TopicExchange::isBound() (the one with 3 parameters, not 2). Looking at the access patterns in this function, and judging by the core dumps,

[jira] Updated: (QPID-1952) C++: client request memory leak on windows

2009-06-30 Thread Steve Huston (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Huston updated QPID-1952: --- Attachment: AsynchIO.cpp.diff David, could you please try the attached AsynchIO.cpp.diff with your tes

[jira] Commented: (QPID-1952) C++: client request memory leak on windows

2009-06-30 Thread Steve Huston (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725670#action_12725670 ] Steve Huston commented on QPID-1952: The patch adds a call to queueForDeletion, but clos

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Ted Ross wrote: > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > build directory but it has the following license text.  I understand that > GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if the > stated exceptions make i

RE: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Steve Huston
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:30 PM > To: dev@qpid.apache.org > Cc: legal-disc...@apache.org > Subject: License question > > > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) > to the CPP build directory but

Re: testAlertingReallyWorks?

2009-06-30 Thread Marnie McCormack
Hi Aidan, Fortunately or unfortunately, It fails pretty regularly so I'm betting you get to raise the JIRA ! Marnie On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Aidan Skinner wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Rafael Schloming > wrote: > > Marnie McCormack wrote: > >> > >> Yes - we see this too. It'

Re: testAlertingReallyWorks?

2009-06-30 Thread Aidan Skinner
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Marnie McCormack wrote: >> >> Yes - we see this too. It's one Aidan has been working on. He's on holiday >> this week but back next week and I know he's keen to bottom it out. > > Would anyone object to me adding it to the exclude list until

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Aidan Skinner
2009/6/30 Ján Sáreník : > Hi Ted! > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: >> If we wanted to include just the generated configure script then it >> looks to me like that is ok, but the m4 macros aren't > > IMHO you do not need to include it in the source at all > (mer

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Ted! On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:30 -0400, Ted Ross wrote: > > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > > build directory but it has the following license text. I understand > > that GPLv2 is not