Rob,
are you able to do a
'thread apply all bt'
on the core. That will allow us to reason through your theory with you
Carl.
rsprin...@mail.etinternational.com wrote:
All,
We've been using Qpid M4 and 0.5 internally, both with C++, and have been
seeing occasional segfaults within the broke
All,
We've been using Qpid M4 and 0.5 internally, both with C++, and have been
seeing occasional segfaults within the broker. They all seem to occur
inside TopicExchange::isBound() (the one with 3 parameters, not 2).
Looking at the access patterns in this function, and judging by the
core dumps,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Huston updated QPID-1952:
---
Attachment: AsynchIO.cpp.diff
David, could you please try the attached AsynchIO.cpp.diff with your tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725670#action_12725670
]
Steve Huston commented on QPID-1952:
The patch adds a call to queueForDeletion, but clos
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
> I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP
> build directory but it has the following license text. I understand that
> GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if the
> stated exceptions make i
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:30 PM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: legal-disc...@apache.org
> Subject: License question
>
>
> I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG)
> to the CPP build directory but
Hi Aidan,
Fortunately or unfortunately, It fails pretty regularly so I'm betting you
get to raise the JIRA !
Marnie
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Rafael Schloming
> wrote:
> > Marnie McCormack wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes - we see this too. It'
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Marnie McCormack wrote:
>>
>> Yes - we see this too. It's one Aidan has been working on. He's on holiday
>> this week but back next week and I know he's keen to bottom it out.
>
> Would anyone object to me adding it to the exclude list until
2009/6/30 Ján Sáreník :
> Hi Ted!
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>> If we wanted to include just the generated configure script then it
>> looks to me like that is ok, but the m4 macros aren't
>
> IMHO you do not need to include it in the source at all
> (mer
Hi Ted!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:30 -0400, Ted Ross wrote:
> > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP
> > build directory but it has the following license text. I understand
> > that GPLv2 is not
10 matches
Mail list logo