[jira] [Created] (QPID-3547) qpid-config currently doesn't display useful information about headers exchange bindings

qpid-config currently doesn't display useful information about headers exchange bindings Key: QPID-3547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3547 Proj

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3548) qpid-route prevents linking between exchanges on the same broker.

qpid-route prevents linking between exchanges on the same broker. - Key: QPID-3548 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3548 Project: Qpid Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3549) A queue created with qpid.last_value_queue=0 behaves like a last-value-queue

A queue created with qpid.last_value_queue=0 behaves like a last-value-queue Key: QPID-3549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3549 Project: Qpid Issue

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-3549) A queue created with qpid.last_value_queue=0 behaves like a last-value-queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross reassigned QPID-3549: -- Assignee: Ted Ross > A queue created with qpid.last_value_queue=0 behaves like a last-value-queue >

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2364/#review2583 --- Alex and I have given the 2 posts a look over. This review represents

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127553#comment-13127553 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - ---

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2364/#review2584 --- http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127610#comment-13127610 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - ---

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

> On 2011-10-14 13:46:19, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Alex and I have given the 2 posts a look over. This review represents both > > our thoughts and contains comments on https://reviews.apache.org/r/2364 and > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/2366 > > > > The lack of proper testing is for us a ba

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127614#comment-13127614 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-3540) Typecasting and alignment requirements for various platforms - "increases required alignment of target type"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chuck Rolke resolved QPID-3540. --- Resolution: Fixed > Typecasting and alignment requirements for various platforms - "increases > r

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-3528) qpid --help has wrong description of sasl-config parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] michael j. goulish resolved QPID-3528. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Future "Fixed" -- sort of -- in r1183121 . Well

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3528) qpid --help has wrong description of sasl-config parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross updated QPID-3528: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Future) 0.13 > qpid --help has wrong description of sasl-confi

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

> On 2011-10-14 13:46:19, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Alex and I have given the 2 posts a look over. This review represents both > > our thoughts and contains comments on https://reviews.apache.org/r/2364 and > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/2366 > > > > The lack of proper testing is for us a ba

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy updated QPID-3401: - Attachment: model2.gif > Refactor address resolution code > > >

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127661#comment-13127661 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 New class structure for address refactoring

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2366/#review2589 --- There are a number of operations performed based on the Destination du

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127664#comment-13127664 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - ---

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

> On 2011-10-14 13:46:19, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Alex and I have given the 2 posts a look over. This review represents both > > our thoughts and contains comments on https://reviews.apache.org/r/2364 and > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/2366 > > > > The lack of proper testing is for us a ba

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127667#comment-13127667 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

> On 2011-10-14 15:09:04, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/AMQSession.java, > > line 976 > > > > > > This new isTopic(Destination)

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127710#comment-13127710 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 New class structure for address refactoring

> On 2011-10-13 15:34:48, Andrew Kennedy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/messaging/address/amqp_0_10/QpidQueue_0_10.java, > > line 80 > > > > > > should

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 New class structure for address refactoring

> On 2011-10-13 16:36:12, Andrew Kennedy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/AddressBasedDestination.java, > > line 100 > > > > > > I assume this an

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127715#comment-13127715 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127716#comment-13127716 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 New class structure for address refactoring

> On 2011-10-14 16:17:48, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: > > There are a number of operations performed based on the Destination during > > client execution, e.g. during Consumer creation and closing, Producer > > creation and closing amongst others. Each of these might be implemented > > differently

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127723#comment-13127723 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-3549) A queue created with qpid.last_value_queue=0 behaves like a last-value-queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Ross resolved QPID-3549. Resolution: Fixed > A queue created with qpid.last_value_queue=0 behaves like a last-value-queue > -

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2323) Add uuid to variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127825#comment-13127825 ] Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-2323: --- This file has several instances of references with a

Re: Review Request: QPID-3401 changes to the core client

> On 2011-10-14 13:46:19, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Alex and I have given the 2 posts a look over. This review represents both > > our thoughts and contains comments on https://reviews.apache.org/r/2364 and > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/2366 > > > > The lack of proper testing is for us a ba

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127907#comment-13127907 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: - bq. On 2011-1