On 17 October 2011 20:58, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>> On 17 October 2011 16:01, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell
>>> wrote:
Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> On 17 October 2011 16:01, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell
>> wrote:
>>> Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during
>>> review of proposed updates to the Address syntax imple
On 17 October 2011 16:01, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>> Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during
>> review of proposed updates to the Address syntax implementation for
>> the Java client, but ultimately looks to be a
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during
> review of proposed updates to the Address syntax implementation for
> the Java client, but ultimately looks to be a wider question for all
> the clients and so I am asking it
Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during
review of proposed updates to the Address syntax implementation for
the Java client, but ultimately looks to be a wider question for all
the clients and so I am asking it here outwith that review.
The documentation for the Address sy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall reopened QPID-3542:
--
Reopening as behaviour in the following scenario is not correct: In the case
where client side filtering is