[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3773) Creating exchange source routes to different brokers can fail if the channels overlap.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189514#comment-13189514 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3773: - ---

Review Request: QPID-3773: generate unique queue names for bridge queues.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3560/ --- Review request for qpid, Gordon Sim, michael goulish, and Ted Ross. Summary

Re: run_federation_test failing on trunk?

On 01/19/2012 05:59 PM, Alan Conway wrote: I'm seeing run_federation_test failing federation.FederationTests.test_pull_from_queue_recovery on trunk. Anybody else see this? federation.FederationTests.test_pull_from_queue_recovery . fail Error during test: Traceback (mo

Re: My Android QPID port progress, PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory question

I ran into the same problem trying to run under OSGi, as the javax packages are not available by default. Here are the needed packages in OSGi: javax.naming javax.naming.ldap javax.naming.event javax.naming.directory javax.naming.spi com.sun.naming.internal I couldn't get com.sun, so I gave up on

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3773) Creating exchange source routes to different brokers can fail if the channels overlap.

Creating exchange source routes to different brokers can fail if the channels overlap. -- Key: QPID-3773 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3773 Project:

RE: run_federation_test failing on trunk?

I'm seeing the same problem on the nightly cmake build on RHEL 5. > -Original Message- > From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:59 PM > To: Qpid Dev > Subject: run_federation_test failing on trunk? > > I'm seeing run_federation_test failing > fe

run_federation_test failing on trunk?

I'm seeing run_federation_test failing federation.FederationTests.test_pull_from_queue_recovery on trunk. Anybody else see this? federation.FederationTests.test_pull_from_queue_recovery . fail Error during test: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14

To the best of my knowledge, the artifacts as published are correct and ready for release. I declare this vote closed, with 6 votes in favor and none against. The 0.14 artifacts are now replicated to the mirrors. I'll publish the final web site updates and send the announce mail tomorrow, an

My Android QPID port progress, PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory question

Hi QPID folks, I'm trying to port: Apache Qpid Client, JMS and JNDI -- to Android. I'm able to get a successful compile/build of my QpidDroid project when running the ant debug install targets after passing Dalvik the --core-library parameter to allow javax packages for JMS/JNDI. I'm hoping to

Federation tests failed for C++ broker last night on Red Hat 5

FYI, the C++ broker's federation test failed last night - this is the first failure noted recently. The output is below. If anyone needs further info on this run or the build or the system, please let me know. -Steve Running federation tests using brokers on ports 49758 37159 50252 48994 federati

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3772) Qpid broker on Windows allows multiple, simultaneous processes to listen to broker port

Qpid broker on Windows allows multiple, simultaneous processes to listen to broker port --- Key: QPID-3772 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3772 Projec

Re: ReviewBoard

On Jan 19, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Weston M. Price wrote: >> To all, >> I setup my first review request last night but not without some issues. >> I could not get RB to accept a Git generated diff no mater what I tried. Is >> t

Re: ReviewBoard

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Weston M. Price wrote: > To all, > I setup my first review request last night but not without some issues. > I could not get RB to accept a Git generated diff no mater what I tried. Is > this is a misconfiguration, something I am doing wrong or wil

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3767) Federation link index becomes invalid on failover against a cluster.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189173#comment-13189173 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3767: - ---

Re: Review Request: Modify Bridge & Link indexing to use explicit names.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3546/#review4470 --- Looks good overall. /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Bridge.cpp

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3770) Decrease memory overhead per message in broker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Armstrong updated QPID-3770: - Labels: broker memory overhead (was: memory overhead) Summary: Decrease memory overhead per m

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3771) Broker does not release memory to OS

Broker does not release memory to OS Key: QPID-3771 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3771 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: C++ Broker Affects Versions: 0.12

ReviewBoard

To all, I setup my first review request last night but not without some issues. I could not get RB to accept a Git generated diff no mater what I tried. Is this is a misconfiguration, something I am doing wrong or will RB only accept diffs generated via SVN? If it is the latter, is ther

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3767) Federation link index becomes invalid on failover against a cluster.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189163#comment-13189163 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3767: - ---

Re: Review Request: Modify Bridge & Link indexing to use explicit names.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3546/#review4469 --- /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Bridge.cpp

[jira] [Created] (QPID-3770) Decrease memory overhead per message

Decrease memory overhead per message Key: QPID-3770 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3770 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: C++ Broker, Performance Affects Ver

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3751) Add Unit/System Testing to JCA Component

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189150#comment-13189150 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3751: - bq. On 2012-0

Re: Review Request: Add Unit/System Testing to Qpid JCA Project

> On 2012-01-19 15:10:21, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > /trunk/qpid/java/build.xml, line 1 > > > > > > There seems to be no actual change to this file, why check it in. I automatically remove trailing whitespaces when saving

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3751) Add Unit/System Testing to JCA Component

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189149#comment-13189149 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3751: - ---

Re: Review Request: Add Unit/System Testing to Qpid JCA Project

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3540/#review4471 --- I've found a few nits: /trunk/qpid/java/.gitignore

Re: Review Request: Modify Bridge & Link indexing to use explicit names.

Hi Rob, Absolutely correct on all points. There would certainly be work required on the Java broker side - for which I'd have to address before providing a more complete patch. I should've been clearer in post - this patch is really preliminary. More of a proof of concept/proposal at this st

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-3762) forcefully closed 0-9-1 connections can leak their IoSender on the broker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall resolved QPID-3762. -- Resolution: Fixed Change look reasonable to me. > forcefully closed 0-9-1 connections c

Re: Review Request: Modify Bridge & Link indexing to use explicit names.

Given that this change affects the management schema and what is effectively the primary key for bridges/links, this will obviously affect the Java broker too. (If checked in as is it would no doubt immediately break the java build). It's not that I personally disagree with the design decisions,

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3767) Federation link index becomes invalid on failover against a cluster.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189129#comment-13189129 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3767: - ---

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-3768) Test org.apache.qpid.server.queue.SortedQueueTest.testGetNextWithAck fails sporadically on CI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall resolved QPID-3768. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.15 > Test org.apache.qpid.server.queue.SortedQueueTest.tes

Review Request: Modify Bridge & Link indexing to use explicit names.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3546/ --- Review request for qpid, Alan Conway, Gordon Sim, michael goulish, and Ted Ross.

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3768) Test org.apache.qpid.server.queue.SortedQueueTest.testGetNextWithAck fails sporadically on CI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189089#comment-13189089 ] Alex Rudyy commented on QPID-3768: -- The changes in tests look fine for me