[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498444#comment-13498444
]
Steve Huston commented on QPID-4424:
It appears that PollableQueue makes an assumption
> On Nov. 15, 2012, 9:17 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
> > I am going to disagree (with the proposed patch, and agree with Andrew). I
> > managed to reproduce (took closer to 15 minutes on my laptop) and get a
> > similar stack trace.
> >
> > I see a shared_ptr with non-null value and use_count o
> On Nov. 15, 2012, 9:17 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
> > I am going to disagree (with the proposed patch, and agree with Andrew). I
> > managed to reproduce (took closer to 15 minutes on my laptop) and get a
> > similar stack trace.
> >
> > I see a shared_ptr with non-null value and use_count o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8072/#review13485
---
I am going to disagree (with the proposed patch, and agree with Andre
> On Nov. 15, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Chug Rolke wrote:
> > Both instances of code kick off a function call into
> > boost::shared_ptr. Before the patch the function
> > is ::operator ::* and after the patch the function is ::get,
> > unsurprisingly. The results are then processed slightly differentl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8072/#review13479
---
Ship it!
Both instances of code kick off a function call into
boost
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 16:33 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 15/11/2012 16:22, Andrew Stitcher a écrit :
>
> > * A literal IP address - IPv6 literal addresses should be enclosed in
> > '['...']'
>
> Is the enclosing for IPv6 addresses really necessary? It should be
> possible to guess the type
> On Nov. 15, 2012, 4:51 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> >
Well because of the way the code is structured it is _possible_ (but admittedly
unlikely) that some other protocol might still be able to run. As a simple
example rdma could still run even if TCP couldn't. In point of fact because of
the w
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8076/#review13473
---
Ship it!
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/windows/SslProtocolFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway resolved QPID-4436.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed on trunk r1409327
> HA fix qpidd crash when mgmt-enable=no
>
Le 15/11/2012 16:22, Andrew Stitcher a écrit :
> * A literal IP address - IPv6 literal addresses should be enclosed in
> '['...']'
Is the enclosing for IPv6 addresses really necessary? It should be
possible to guess the type reliably from the input value (either
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for IPv4, otherwi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8076/
---
Review request for qpid.
Description
---
This change introduces a new --int
Philip Harvey created QPID-4438:
---
Summary: Java broker would be easier to support if it reported a
better summary of usage
Key: QPID-4438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4438
Project: Qp
13 matches
Mail list logo