[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696660#comment-13696660
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4958:
---
Commit 14983
On 06/29/2013 03:47 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
Some of this is making me a little nervous in particular the response
around my headers Address String, but I might me misunderstanding e.g.
"That would now be handled in two steps. The first is a configuration
step whereby a 'topic' is created referen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Harvey resolved QPID-4958.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.23
> Java Performance Tests - race condition client
Rob Godfrey created QPID-4970:
-
Summary: [Java Broker] Configure MessageStores based on
VirtualHost object not XML Configuration
Key: QPID-4970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4970
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696681#comment-13696681
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4970:
---
Commit 14983
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696748#comment-13696748
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-4969:
--
This also breaks the unit tests, though in that case i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696750#comment-13696750
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-4969:
--
The test should also be fixed, e.g.:
{noformat}
Index
>
> [X] * When 0.25 opens after the 0.24 beta branch remove the C++
> qpid autotools build infrastructure in favour of the cmake tools.
> * A heads up message to the user mailing list.
> * Add a release note to 0.24 to say it is the last release that will
> contain an autoto
[ x ] * When 0.25 opens after the 0.24 beta branch remove the C++
qpid autotools build infrastructure in favour of the cmake tools.
On 27 June 2013 05:40, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> In March this year we had a discussion about removing finally switching
> from autotools to cmake in the C++
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
** CID 1040638: Mixing enum types (MIXED_ENUMS)
/qpidbuilds/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/acl/AclData.cpp: 184
** CID 1040637: Missing unlock (LOCK)
/q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696920#comment-13696920
]
Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-4969:
---
Gordon's patch (thanks for that!) still fails Fraser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696947#comment-13696947
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-4969:
--
Actually... I take that back. I'm not sure it is corre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13696936#comment-13696936
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-4969:
--
My patch _does_ fix Fraser's case (at least as far as
Unless I'm missing something subtle, this appears to be a false positive.
Coverity marked a few uses of ScopedLock with this error, but not all, which
seems curious.
-K
- Forwarded Message -
> From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 5:39:43
I agree, Ken. If anyone knows how to make Coverity stop this, please let me
know. Else I'll check into it. I know there are a few ways to mark things as
false positive.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Giusti [mailto:kgiu...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 1:17 PM
> To: Qpid De
Hi Steve,
I've marked that particular error as "false positive" in Coverity Connect, but
from what I can tell, the "right" way to fix such lock wrapper classes is to
create a "model" for those wrapper classes. There's some documentation here:
http://scan5.coverity.com:8080/docs/en/cov_checker
That particular ScopedLock had a ScopedUnlock inside its scope. I
wonder if that is leading Coverity astray.
-Ted
On 07/01/2013 01:16 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
Unless I'm missing something subtle, this appears to be a false positive.
Coverity marked a few uses of ScopedLock with this error, but
Yes, there is a way - I can do it, probably because I'm the admin for the
project. If you create one, I'll set it up.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Giusti [mailto:kgiu...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:11 PM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Defects reported by
Chuck Rolke created QPID-4971:
-
Summary: C++ Broker queue settings have uninitialized variables
Key: QPID-4971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4971
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697084#comment-13697084
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4971:
---
Commit 14986
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697095#comment-13697095
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4943:
---
Commit 14986
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697113#comment-13697113
]
Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-4969:
---
We need to call the federation addOrigin function as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697139#comment-13697139
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4969:
---
Commit 14986
Ok - I'll give it a go, stay tuned.
-K
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Huston"
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 2:32:14 PM
> Subject: RE: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
>
> Yes, there is a way - I can do it, probably because I'm the admin
24 matches
Mail list logo