---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28209/
---
Review request for qpid and Gordon Sim.
Repository: qpid
Description
---
Following Andrew's lead, I've posted a pull request for review
feedback on an "extended usage pattern" to the Proton API to specify
alternate certificate containers, for Windows in this case, but it
should also apply to alternate SSL/TLS implementations such as NSS or Java
keystores.
https://git
On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 15:14 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> I've posted a pull request against the Github Apache proton mirror to
> get review feedback for my IO layer refactoring.
>
> https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/1
I've added a change to this request to correctly support the previo
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 14:00 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrew Stitcher
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:41 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > > On 11/18/2014 05:29 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:35 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Stitcher
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:35 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher
> > wrote:
> > ...
> > There are a couple things I don't like about the API after the change.
> >
> > 1. pn_transport_client(
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrew Stitcher
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:41 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > On 11/18/2014 05:29 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:35 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > >> 2. Given that we have a distinct configuration phase regardless
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:41 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 05:29 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:35 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> >> 2. Given that we have a distinct configuration phase regardless, it is
> >> simply unnecessary to force people to choose client v
On 11/18/2014 05:29 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:35 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
2. Given that we have a distinct configuration phase regardless, it is
simply unnecessary to force people to choose client vs server up front. We
can simply default the mode to client and ha
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 09:35 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher
> wrote:
> ...
> There are a couple things I don't like about the API after the change.
>
> 1. pn_transport_client()/pn_transport_server() don't follow our naming
> conventions, as constr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216445#comment-14216445
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6233:
---
Commit 16403
Alex Rudyy created QPID-6233:
Summary: [Java Broker] Update operational logging appendix in Java
Broker documentation
Key: QPID-6233
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6233
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216437#comment-14216437
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6226:
---
Commit 16403
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy reassigned QPID-6231:
Assignee: Keith Wall (was: Alex Rudyy)
Keith,
Could you please review the changes?
> [Perftests fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy updated QPID-6231:
-
Status: Reviewable (was: In Progress)
> [Perftests framework] Make performance framework fully JMS compati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216340#comment-14216340
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on DISPATCH-74:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216312#comment-14216312
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6231:
---
Commit 16403
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim van der Riet updated QPID-6230:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.31
> [linearstore] qpid-qls-analyze fails when analyzing empty journal
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Moravec closed QPID-6232.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Future
Committed revision 1640357.
> [C++ broker] Linearstore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216255#comment-14216255
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6232:
---
Commit 16403
Pavel Moravec created QPID-6232:
---
Summary: [C++ broker] Linearstore segfaults when ulimit prevents
creating new file in EFP
Key: QPID-6232
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6232
Project: Q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy updated QPID-6231:
-
Attachment: 0001-QPID-6231-Perftests-framework-Make-performance-frame.patch
Attached a patch with proposed
On 11/18/2014 02:35 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I would suggest the following options for this particular API point as both
being preferable.
1. if we really want to force people to choose up front, the right way to
do it is with a single constructor:
pn_transport_t *t = pn_transport(CLI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim van der Riet resolved QPID-6230.
Resolution: Fixed
svn r.1640353 adds a simple check for this condition and avoids the error.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216240#comment-14216240
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6230:
---
Commit 16403
Alex Rudyy created QPID-6231:
Summary: [Perftests framework] Make performance framework fully
JMS compatible
Key: QPID-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6231
Project: Qpid
Iss
Kim van der Riet created QPID-6230:
--
Summary: [linearstore] qpid-qls-analyze fails when analyzing empty
journal
Key: QPID-6230
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6230
Project: Qpid
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher
wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 20:56 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > On 11/17/2014 08:14 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > > As we currently don't have reviewboard set up for Qpid Proton (since
> the
> > > git migration).
> > >
> > > I've posted a pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6208:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.30
> PermittedNodeList seen to disappear while performing certain HA operations
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216133#comment-14216133
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-4708:
--
This issue is for the c++ client. I believe the JMS cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216097#comment-14216097
]
Gianni Codevico edited comment on QPID-4708 at 11/18/14 11:46 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216097#comment-14216097
]
Gianni Codevico commented on QPID-4708:
---
Hi,
I am testing a connection using the QPid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy resolved QPID-6208.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The change look reasonable to me
> PermittedNodeList seen to disappear while performin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy resolved QPID-6222.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The change look reasonable to me
> [Java Broker] Replica can go into a loop if it runs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall reopened QPID-6222:
--
> [Java Broker] Replica can go into a loop if it runs out of disk space
> ---
On 11/17/2014 09:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 20:56 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 11/17/2014 08:14 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
As we currently don't have reviewboard set up for Qpid Proton (since the
git migration).
I've posted a pull request against the Github Apache proto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14215999#comment-14215999
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6222:
---
Commit 16402
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14215997#comment-14215997
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6208:
---
Commit 16402
I say "Ship it!".
I don't feel strongly about the deprecated bits, but if we don't
remove them now, when is the "right" or at least better time?
Cliff
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> As we currently don't have reviewboard set up for Qpid Proton (since the
> git migrat
38 matches
Mail list logo
