[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14791695#comment-14791695
]
Pavel Moravec commented on QPID-6740:
-
Interesting use case.. Per my testing on upstream qpid (and 0.30
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14802781#comment-14802781
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-109:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14802780#comment-14802780
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-110:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14802795#comment-14802795
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPIDJMS-110:
I've made another change aimed specifically at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14802685#comment-14802685
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6678:
---
Commit 1703548 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6678:
-
Fix Version/s: qpid-java-6.0
> Deleting an exchange that is referenced as alternate apparently succeeds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall resolved QPID-6678.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Alex,
Changes look reasonable to me. We talked and agreed an additional change -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall closed QPID-6678.
> Deleting an exchange that is referenced as alternate apparently succeeds but
> marks the exchange as DELETED
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14802834#comment-14802834
]
Jakub Scholz commented on QPIDJMS-110:
--
I have retested both scenarios which I mentioned and can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Rudyy updated QPID-6742:
-
Attachment: add-utility-to-measure-memory-consumption.diff
> [Java Broker] Determine heap and direct
Alex Rudyy created QPID-6742:
Summary: [Java Broker] Determine heap and direct memory
consumption by Java Broker with JDK 1.7/1.8
Key: QPID-6742
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6742
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPIDJMS-110.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
Great, thanks for verifying so quickly.
>
Keith Wall created QPID-6741:
Summary: ThreadPoolExecutors used for virtual host IO/port IO do
not scale above
Key: QPID-6741
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6741:
-
Fix Version/s: qpid-java-6.0
> ThreadPoolExecutors used for virtual host IO / port IO do not scale above
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38439/#review99380
---
-1
See my latest comment on PROTON-992 as to why I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6741:
-
Component/s: Java Broker
> ThreadPoolExecutors used for virtual host IO / port IO do not scale above
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6741:
-
Description:
NetworkConnectionScheduler uses a {{java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor}}
to service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14803008#comment-14803008
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6741:
---
Commit 1703636 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6741:
-
Affects Version/s: qpid-java-6.0
> ThreadPoolExecutors used for virtual host IO / port IO do not scale
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6741:
-
Summary: ThreadPoolExecutors used for virtual host IO / port IO do not
scale above minimum pool size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14803413#comment-14803413
]
Keith Wall edited comment on QPID-6738 at 9/17/15 6:51 PM:
---
Yes, I agree, in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14803413#comment-14803413
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-6738:
--
Yes, I agree, in 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT the client no longer fails with a NPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14804633#comment-14804633
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-6742:
---
Commit 1703721 from
23 matches
Mail list logo