Re: C++ and Java Broker common configuration and tooling

2010-01-06 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/04/2010 04:27 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote: Happy New Year all... So, at the start of this new year I think it is important that we try to focus on improving the experience of our project... and in particular I think we should be looking at making the project look like a single coherent

Re: C++ and Java Broker common configuration and tooling

2010-01-06 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/06/2010 06:52 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote: 2010/1/6 Rafael Schlomingrafa...@redhat.com Robert Godfrey wrote: Overall I think with a bit of work from both the C++ and Java communities we can get the brokers to look and behave much more similarly... however we will also need to change the

Re: C++ and Java Broker common configuration and tooling

2010-01-06 Thread Rafael Schloming
Alan Conway wrote: On 01/06/2010 06:52 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote: 2010/1/6 Rafael Schlomingrafa...@redhat.com Robert Godfrey wrote: Overall I think with a bit of work from both the C++ and Java communities we can get the brokers to look and behave much more similarly... however we will

Re: C++ and Java Broker common configuration and tooling

2010-01-06 Thread Robert Godfrey
I don't wish to overcomplicate, but do you want some grouping of features... (e.g. a parentFeature tag) if we're looking at the same sort of granularity as unit tests, that should be quite fine... but many of them may be aspects of the same feature... -- Rob 2010/1/6 Rafael Schloming

C++ and Java Broker common configuration and tooling

2010-01-04 Thread Robert Godfrey
Happy New Year all... So, at the start of this new year I think it is important that we try to focus on improving the experience of our project... and in particular I think we should be looking at making the project look like a single coherent whole. Currently the Java and C++ Brokers look and