Re: License question

2009-07-01 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ted Ross wrote: > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > build directory but it has the following license text.  I understand that > GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if the > stated exceptions make i

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Ted Ross wrote: > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > build directory but it has the following license text.  I understand that > GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if the > stated exceptions make i

RE: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Steve Huston
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:30 PM > To: dev@qpid.apache.org > Cc: legal-disc...@apache.org > Subject: License question > > > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) >

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Aidan Skinner
2009/6/30 Ján Sáreník : > Hi Ted! > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: >> If we wanted to include just the generated configure script then it >> looks to me like that is ok, but the m4 macros aren't > > IMHO you do not need to include it in the source at all > (mer

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Ted! On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:30 -0400, Ted Ross wrote: > > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > > build directory but it has the following license text. I understand > > that GPLv2 is not

Re: License question

2009-06-29 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:30 -0400, Ted Ross wrote: > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > build directory but it has the following license text. I understand > that GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if > the stated exceptions m

Re: License question

2009-06-29 Thread Aidan Skinner
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Ted Ross wrote: > I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP > build directory but it has the following license text.  I understand that > GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if the > stated exceptions make

License question

2009-06-29 Thread Ted Ross
I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP build directory but it has the following license text. I understand that GPLv2 is not compatible with the Apache license but I don't know if the stated exceptions make it ok to incorporate this source. Can someone with mo

Re: Dependencies license question

2009-02-02 Thread Carl Trieloff
ASL & EPL are cleared for use as dependencies in Apache. We also need to deal with the package & all the dependencies. Carl. Andrea Gazzarini wrote: Hi All, I'm going to submit the first version of QMan Admin console.Before explaining what it is and how it's working I need help about licensi

Re: Dependencies license question

2009-02-02 Thread Marnie McCormack
It's in java/resources and contains all the applicable licenses. M On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote: > Hi Marnie, thanks for reply. Just two questions : > > "add details of each additional license to the license file in svn (they're > separated by language) > We used to sto

Re: Dependencies license question

2009-02-02 Thread Andrea Gazzarini
Sorry there was only "one" question... Andrea 2009/2/2 Andrea Gazzarini > Hi Marnie, thanks for reply. Just two questions : > > "add details of each additional license to the license file in svn (they're > separated by language) > We used to store a license file alongside the jars but it looks

Re: Dependencies license question

2009-02-02 Thread Andrea Gazzarini
Hi Marnie, thanks for reply. Just two questions : "add details of each additional license to the license file in svn (they're separated by language) We used to store a license file alongside the jars but it looks like we abandoned than in favour of one big license file (correct me here if I'm wron

Re: Dependencies license question

2009-02-02 Thread Marnie McCormack
Hi Andrea, If we distribute (or store in our repo) any licensed artifact, then we (sadly) have to take on the responsibility of dealing with it. Most likely the licenses are ok to use (since Jetty is also Apace licensed) but you'll have to check each one and include it as appropriate for Qpid. Bas

Dependencies license question

2009-02-01 Thread Andrea Gazzarini
Hi All, I'm going to submit the first version of QMan Admin console.Before explaining what it is and how it's working I need help about licensing of included dependencies. At the moment (I'm referring to the submitted version) QMan is using only the Jetty runtime libraries - jetty-6.1.14.jar