Folks,
There's some old QMF-related code in our repo that appears to be quite dead.
If said code is in fact "pushing up the daisies", I'd like to see removed prior
to the 0.24 release.
First, there's stuff that I'm almost certain is stone cold dead. AFAIK, this
shouldn't be used by anyone. I
On 18/06/13 23:30, Ken Giusti wrote:
Folks,
There's some old QMF-related code in our repo that appears to be quite dead.
If said code is in fact "pushing up the daisies", I'd like to see removed prior
to the 0.24 release.
First, there's stuff that I'm almost certain is stone cold dead. AFAIK
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 20:04 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
> On ...
> So how about
> a) A few more warnings like this shouted out on the user list.
> b) disabling it from building as the default and requiring an explicit
> option
> c) updating the doco to say it's in the departure lounge and will be
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 18:30 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Folks,
>
> There's some old QMF-related code in our repo that appears to be quite dead.
I've create a JIRA to track this work:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4940
I'm in the mood to remove lots of code from the tree ;-), so I'l
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 15:30 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 18:30 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > There's some old QMF-related code in our repo that appears to be quite dead.
>
> I've create a JIRA to track this work:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Q
- Original Message -
> From: "Fraser Adams"
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org, us...@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:04:08 PM
> Subject: Re: QPID code reorg/cleanups - please read.
>
> On 18/06/13 23:30, Ken Giusti wrote:
> > Folks,
> &g
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Justin - would it be possible to push back the start of Alpha? I imagine
> removing files could potentially affect distro stability, wouldn't want that
> to happen in Beta, right?
Yes. I'll retarget the Alpha for the middle of next week.
J
ends on it.
- Original Message -
> From: "Bill Freeman"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 1:08:29 PM
> Subject: Re: proposed removal of qpid::client API (was Re: QPID code
> reorg/cleanups - please read.)
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Andrew
Not to forget that the WCF project also links to qpidclient. Would the proposed
changes retire WCF as well?
-Chuck
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.or
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:27 -0400, Chuck Rolke wrote:
> Not to forget that the WCF project also links to qpidclient. Would the
> proposed changes retire WCF as well?
I don't think so - the WCF build is entirely internal to qpid and the
header files are still present internally (after all the mess
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:02 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Good point Bill - I've created a JIRA to cut the console over to the
> messaging api:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4945
>
>
> Though, technically, I don't think we can easily remove the old client API
> from the _python_
11 matches
Mail list logo
