> On Aug. 12, 2015, 3:20 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> > I want to clarify my thoughts for discussion, I'm working on putting this
> > into code.
> >
> > DESIGN PRINCIPLES:
> >
> > 1. C++ is not python. In C++ it is normal to provide "raw" alloc/free style
> > pairs, esp. when wrapping C. Automa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37217/#review95090
---
I want to clarify my thoughts for discussion, I'm working on putting
> On Aug. 7, 2015, 2:54 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> > I would like to try something simpler (sorry!)
> >
> > There are 2 things I'd like to separate:
> >
> > 1. Clean, simple, no-value-add access to proton types.
> > 2. Separate convenience classes to make proton easier to use.
> >
> > For 1. t
> On Aug. 7, 2015, 2:54 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> > I would like to try something simpler (sorry!)
> >
> > There are 2 things I'd like to separate:
> >
> > 1. Clean, simple, no-value-add access to proton types.
> > 2. Separate convenience classes to make proton easier to use.
> >
> > For 1. t
> On Aug. 7, 2015, 2:54 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> > I would like to try something simpler (sorry!)
> >
> > There are 2 things I'd like to separate:
> >
> > 1. Clean, simple, no-value-add access to proton types.
> > 2. Separate convenience classes to make proton easier to use.
> >
> > For 1. t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37217/#review94542
---
I would like to try something simpler (sorry!)
There are 2 things I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37217/
---
Review request for qpid, Alan Conway and Andrew Stitcher.
Bugs: PROTON-865
