[GitHub] incubator-quickstep pull request: Minor Improvements in Storage.

Github user zuyu commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/6 CI failed due to the failure to fetch llvm compiler. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe

Re: SUBSCRIBE

You’ll need to subscribe yourself. See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-quickstep-dev/ and similar. > On May 31, 2016, at 12:30 PM, Rogers Jeffrey > wrote: > > Please subscribe me to the lists > > Thanks an

[GitHub] incubator-quickstep pull request: Minor Improvements in Storage.

GitHub user zuyu opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/6 Minor Improvements in Storage. This small PR replaced depreciated macros with `glog`, and also chose to check the valid proto only in the debug build. You can merge this pull request into a

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > There is already a definitive answer: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-156 > It is a good answer, but strictly speaking Mark wasn't VP of Legal at ASF at that point, so I don't

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

There is already a definitive answer: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-156 But I agree with you, Spark’s process is a good one for Quickstep to adopt. Julian > On May 31, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, May

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Roman, > > Requiring the contributor to log a JIRA makes a lot of sense, and a lot of > projects do that. > But from an IP hygiene standpoint, my understanding is that it is sufficient > that the contributor > has created a github pull reque

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Roman, Requiring the contributor to log a JIRA makes a lot of sense, and a lot of projects do that. But from an IP hygiene standpoint, my understanding is that it is sufficient that the contributor has created a github pull request to a project under https://github.com/apache. Just like attachi

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > > I see Siddharth Suresh, Navneet Potti and Craig Chasseur are missing. I > believe they have signed the ICLA. > Both Sid and Navneet are in the contributor list: http://people.apache.org/unlistedclas.html

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Thanks Zuyu! I wasn’t there about a while ago, so good to see that it is > listed there. > > I see Siddharth Suresh, Navneet Potti and Craig Chasseur are missing. > I believe they have signed the ICLA. Others may be missing too — haven’t do

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Great tip Roman! I’ll work on a similar page for us over the next week. Cheers, Jignesh > On May 31, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> Hi Roman, >> >> I’m guessing that someone closing a PR should check if the committer

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Hi Roman, > > I’m guessing that someone closing a PR should check if the committer has an > ICLA. > Or, is submitting a PR and implicit assignment by the code contributor that > they are > willing to donate the code to Apache? The safest

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Hi Roman, I’m guessing that someone closing a PR should check if the committer has an ICLA. Or, is submitting a PR and implicit assignment by the code contributor that they are willing to donate the code to Apache? Cheers, Jignesh > On May 31, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Thanks Zuyu! I wasn’t there about a while ago, so good to see that it is listed there. I see Siddharth Suresh, Navneet Potti and Craig Chasseur are missing. I believe they have signed the ICLA. Others may be missing too — haven’t done a full check. I wonder if they have misses a step that I

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Quick update on the Quickstep project: > > We are now transitioned to ASF. So, no new commits should go to the old repo. > The workflow for committers is at: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/QUICKSTEP/Workflow+For+Committers >

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Hi Jignesh, I could find your name in the list: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#P ​ Cheers, Zuyu

Update on the Quickstep project

Quick update on the Quickstep project: We are now transitioned to ASF. So, no new commits should go to the old repo. The workflow for committers is at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/QUICKSTEP/Workflow+For+Committers

Podling Report Reminder - June 2016

Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 June 2016, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will form a