I'm getting this:
[ro...@penghu] ~/git/plt/collects$ raco setup -u
/Users/robby/git/exp/plt/bin/raco setup: unknown switch: -u
Robby
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
> raco setup -u will build collects in parallel, using all the cores your
> machine has.
> rack setup -u -j X ie
I suggested that Kevin let others try parallel mode for a day or two
before making it the default.
At Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:38:55 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> That sounds right to me too.
>
> Robby
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
> >
> > Why don't you use make par
That sounds right to me too.
Robby
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Why don't you use make parallel setup the standard?
>
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
>
>> raco setup -u will build collects in parallel, using all the cores your
>> machine has.
Great!
Robby
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
> raco setup -u will build collects in parallel, using all the cores your
> machine has.
> rack setup -u -j X ie (-j 2) can be used to throttle parallel build to only
> use X cores.
>
> Parallel build is currently done by spawning wor
Why don't you use make parallel setup the standard?
On Jul 2, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
> raco setup -u will build collects in parallel, using all the cores your
> machine has.
> rack setup -u -j X ie (-j 2) can be used to throttle parallel build to only
> use X cores.
>
> Paralle
raco setup -u will build collects in parallel, using all the cores your
machine has.
rack setup -u -j X ie (-j 2) can be used to throttle parallel build to
only use X cores.
Parallel build is currently done by spawning worker processes and
communicating over pipes.
Building scribble documentat
On 07/02/2010 11:50 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Jul 2, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I think this really gets at the questions,
>>
>> what is the purpose of a collect?
>>
>> Even if we ignore the distribution idea, it should concern us that
>> we don't have a concise answer for that
On Jul 2, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> In both of these cases,
> I think that the *proper* way to tackle the changes is to move code
> between packages (even if it keeps the same owner) -- *not* to create
> the connections and leave the code where it is.
This is good software engineer
On Jul 2, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> 1. Size matters even if it doesn't really matter. Seeing these
>numbers makes it clear that our download will be called a
>behemoth and an ms style colossus. We all know that in the end,
>this number is irrelevant. PLT comes with a lot of extra stu
On the abundance of riches;
On Friday, July 2, 2010, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> 1. Size matters even if it doesn't really matter. Seeing these numbers makes
> it clear that our download will be called a behemoth and an ms style
> colossus. We all know that in the end, this number is irreleva
1. Size matters even if it doesn't really matter. Seeing these numbers makes it
clear that our download will be called a behemoth and an ms style colossus. We
all know that in the end, this number is irrelevant. PLT comes with a lot of
extra stuff and that stuff is useful. But among the hacker
On Jul 2, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> Did you forget java and gcc?
Here's a few more:
winooski:~ eli> rpm -q --queryformat '%{SIZE} %{NAME}\n' tcl perl ghc js python
ruby lua plt-scheme gcc-java gcc kawa guile bigloo | sort -n
595769 lua
962834 js
1441553 ghc
1679403 ruby
3318547 guile
3669827 t
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Jul 2, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Those numbers seem pretty small in today's disk sizes,
>
> Obviously -- but the issue is not diskspace.
>
> And Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> I feel like I routinely download programs and dev environments where
>> th
The git.racket-lang.org pages are also recketified now. Hopefully
there are no width problems with it now.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_
On Jul 2, Robby Findler wrote:
> Those numbers seem pretty small in today's disk sizes,
Obviously -- but the issue is not diskspace.
And Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I feel like I routinely download programs and dev environments where
> the distribution is over 100MBs.
winooski:~/mail eli> rpm -q --
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Those numbers seem pretty small in today's disk sizes, but I do agree
> that there is value in being able to divide up the distribution and to
> be able to stratify things so we can better keep track of our
> dependencies.
I feel like I routi
Those numbers seem pretty small in today's disk sizes, but I do agree
that there is value in being able to divide up the distribution and to
be able to stratify things so we can better keep track of our
dependencies. (BTW, just a random question: have you thought about
trying to visualize the colle
17 matches
Mail list logo
