Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.0.1

2010-07-20 Thread John Clements
On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > * John Clements > - Stepper Tests done. > Updates: > - Stepper Updates: update HISTORY > (updates should show v5.0.1 as the most current version; email me > to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such > chang

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.0.1

2010-07-20 Thread Casey Klein
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > > * Casey Klein >  - Redex Tests Done. >  Updates: >  - Redex Updates: update HISTORY >  (updates should show v5.0.1 as the most current version; email me >  to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such >  change

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Robby Findler
Sorry-- I should have been more clear: this looks like a bug and we'll try to get it fixed. Robby On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Doug Williams wrote: > Since it is autogenerated code, most of the time it is just run once (via a > shell call) and discarded - it's the results that are important

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
Since it is autogenerated code, most of the time it is just run once (via a shell call) and discarded - it's the results that are important and send back to the knowledge base. So, I don't need to keep the .zo files up to date. In fact, the only reason I ever execute the autogenerated code under Dr

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Robby Findler
Did you try disabling the automatic compilation (in the details portion of the language dialog)? My guess is that that will make the problem go away. (If so, you can also then start running "raco make " in the shell to keep the .zo files up to date and save on load times.) Robby On Tue, Jul 20, 2

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
Okay, some more information. If I execute DrRacket with the Monte Carlo file, make sure Debugging is checked (in the Language dialog with Show Details), and hit Run, I get the error: string as 1st argument, given: #f; other arguments were: "0fe14e326dff1551df22271bdae03080a46dff5a9cd41e2f58a86ac8

[racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
I seem have hit the same (or related) bug that Laurent Orseau submitted as bug 11017 (but in a completely different context that might help track it down) and I haven't been able to find a workaround. The actual error message I get is: string as 1st argument, given: #f; other arguments were: "c2

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.0.1

2010-07-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:47:03 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > * Matthew Flatt > - Racket Tests > - Languages Tests > - GRacket Tests (Also check that `gracket -z' and `gracket-text' still > works in Windows and Mac OS X) > - mzc Tests > - mzc --exe tests > - .plt-packing Tests > -

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.0.1

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
Done. The PLoT demos and extensions in the science collection work as expected. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > Checklist items for the v5.0.1 release > (using the v5.0.0.900 release candidate build) > > Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish