I have a function that gets called by OS X's CoreMIDI framework. This
function adds some data to a queue. I have registered the queue and the
function with scheme_add_evt and scheme_add_evt_through_sema and even
explicitly tried to block with scheme_block_until on separate occasions. In
all instanc
The old error was a problem with inline assembly that would show up
when gcc optimization is disabled. (Why was -O2 disabled for your
build?) I fixed that problem a few days ago, though I didn't make the
connection to your earlier post.
The new error looks like a mismatch in the way that files hav
I decided to try compiling Racket on my home desktop again. With futures
disabled I get a different error. I am on a 32-bit mac, so maybe things aren't
tested on there very often. It's a Core Duo processor.
ranlib: file: libracket.a(darwin64.o) has no symbols
ranlib: file: libracket.a(ffi64.o
A while ago I thought up an alternate syntax that converts directly into
S-Exp in an effort to reduce the number of parenthesis, hopefully
simplify the way a program looked, and still be completely compatible
(including macros) with the current Racket API. To test out my solution
I've been usi
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:16:35 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Three minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:43:03 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > > > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > > > > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15
Three minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:43:03 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > > > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > > > > I'd love to see an impl
That sounds right to me. Which body-like sequence is missing?
Robby
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Jos Koot wrote:
> We already have begin-with-definitions. Would there be a great penalty to
> simply wrap every body-like sequence of expressions and definitions with
> begin-with-definitions? Th
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:43:03 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > > > I'd love to see an implicit `#%begin', which could have the
> > > > > abo
Thanks. In lacked to see the introduction of this feature. I checked and it
works (OF COURSE)
Jos
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Flatt [mailto:mfl...@cs.utah.edu]
> Sent: 12 October 2010 16:40
> To: Jos Koot
> Cc: dev@racket-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [racket-dev] `cond' / `when' / `un
An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > > I'd love to see an implicit `#%begin', which could have the
> > > > above apply in more places automatically. (It was one of the
> > > >
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:35:54 +0200, "Jos Koot" wrote:
> We already have begin-with-definitions. Would there be a great penalty to
> simply wrap every body-like sequence of expressions and definitions with
> begin-with-definitions? The latter even allows more freedom than (let () def
> ... expr ...)
We already have begin-with-definitions. Would there be a great penalty to
simply wrap every body-like sequence of expressions and definitions with
begin-with-definitions? The latter even allows more freedom than (let () def
... expr ...), for it allows (begin-with-definitions def-or-expr ...). I am
On 12 October 2010 13:14, Noel Welsh wrote:
> I think those instructions are for committeerrss. You will probably
> have a better experience overall if you go with the github mirror:
Thanks Noel.
This is what I ended up doing.
Horace.
_
For list
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > I'd love to see an implicit `#%begin', which could have the above
> > > apply in more places automatically. (It was one of the feature
> > > requests I asked for in the summer
I think those instructions are for committeerrss. You will probably
have a better experience overall if you go with the github mirror:
http://github.com/plt/racket
To clone this just issue
git clone http://github.com/plt/racket.git
HTH,
N.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Horace Dynamite
I'm trying to follow the PLT git instructions located here,
http://git.racket-lang.org/intro.html
It says that you should get back information about your permissions
when you connect to the gitolite server like so,
ssh g...@git.racket-lang.org
But this is what happens when I try,
> ssh g...@gi
16 matches
Mail list logo
