The git repository now includes a "gr2" branch for the new
implementation of `racket/gui', which we've been informally calling
"GRacket2".
The new `racket/gui' is intended to be mostly compatible with the
current library, but there are some significant incompatibilities.
Those differences are desc
Please find your name below and provide some blurb for the 5.0.2 changelog
Author: Jay McCarthy
- Adding define-datatype to ASL
- PLAI changes
- Webserver changes
Author: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Faster loading of TR files?
Author: Casey Klein
redex things?
Author: Matthew Fla
7 hours ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> I agree with Sam. A change from 5.2 to 5.5 wouldn't make me think
> "oh, lots of stuff changed but not enough to warrant a major
> number", instead I would think "well what happened to 5.3 and 5.4?"
(I find this point to be the most convincing for a 5.1 version.)
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> The contract library's dependent contracts are now faster and properly
> assign blame when they are internally inconsistent see the docs for
> ->i for more details.
(this one is still okay).
> The 2htdp/image library now supports pinholes (
Please reply to Jon with release messages soon -- that's the only
thing left for the release.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_
For
I found in the reference manual that eqv? works for NANs. I assume that eqv?
or = would both work on infinities. Here again, the science collection uses
eqv? for both infinities and NANs - so I may have discussed this with you
years ago when I originally wrote them. But I do think that adding expli
Would people like a list of their own commits and they can choose which
ones should have an accompanying release note?
$ git log da9b718bf80c3e678e1d9372c521d512e0b91747..master --author=rafkind
On 10/27/2010 03:55 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>
At Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:20:37 -0600, Doug Williams wrote:
> What is the correct way to test for +nan.0 in Racket? For example, (= +nan.0
> +nan.0) = #f. This seems to be the behavior specified in R6RS. In the
> science collection I implemented nan? using eqv?, which seems to work in
> Racket; but th
Does (not (= x x)) work? That's the way people sometimes do it JavaScript, so
it can't be wrong.
Dave
On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Doug Williams wrote:
> What is the correct way to test for +nan.0 in Racket? For example, (= +nan.0
> +nan.0) = #f. This seems to be the behavior specified in R6RS
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Here is the raw changelog for 5.0.2. If you would like to summarize your
> changes please do so, otherwise someone (me/eli/ryan) will do it for
> you. If there are any other important items to note for this release
> please make a note of them
On Oct 27, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think Robby recently changed DrRacket so that user programs don't
> share `ffi/unsafe' with DrRacket. That would lead to multiple
> `s16vector' structure types (which didn't occur to me when Robby asked
> if it would be ok to not share), and t
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Is there no conventional precedent for this?
There are several numbering schemes in use in projects that I know about:
1. major.minor.patch, as with us. The Linux Kernel, GCC, Subversion,
Git, and many many other projects use this.
2. majo
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>>> mflatt has updated `gr2' from 5633895cf0 to 2b2de4ece6.
>>> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5633895cf0..2b2de4ece6
>>
>> So, I see from this commit that you're planning to mo
On 10/27/2010 02:22 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>>> mflatt has updated `gr2' from 5633895cf0 to 2b2de4ece6.
>>> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5633895cf0..2b2de4ece6
>> So, I see from this commit that you're planning to move the versio
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> mflatt has updated `gr2' from 5633895cf0 to 2b2de4ece6.
>> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5633895cf0..2b2de4ece6
>
> So, I see from this commit that you're planning to move the version
> number to 5.5. I think this is a mistake. We'
What is the correct way to test for +nan.0 in Racket? For example, (= +nan.0
+nan.0) = #f. This seems to be the behavior specified in R6RS. In the
science collection I implemented nan? using eqv?, which seems to work in
Racket; but the result is explicitly unspecified in R6RS, which I assume
means
> mflatt has updated `gr2' from 5633895cf0 to 2b2de4ece6.
> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5633895cf0..2b2de4ece6
So, I see from this commit that you're planning to move the version
number to 5.5. I think this is a mistake. We've been trying to be
more "conventional" in our project managment, a
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Noel Welsh
> - Rackunit Tests
> - SRFI Tests
> - Ensure that all claimed srfi's are in the installer and they all
> load into racket or drracket (as appropriate)
DONE
N.
_
For list
18 matches
Mail list logo
