Three hours ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 03:50 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> >
> > --> Release candidates are at
> > --> http://pre.racket-lang.org/release/installers
>
> This link is a 404.
Yes, there is no release candidate build yet -- I'll start a build as
soon as I get replies abo
On 01/31/2011 03:50 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Checklist items for the v5.1 release
> (using the v5.0.99.900 release candidate build)
>
> Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
> item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
> commits that
Checklist items for the v5.1 release
(using the v5.0.99.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes are
9 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Interesting point. With types, this issue just goes away.
>
> (No matter what, I argue that Lazy should be totally compatible in
> contracts/types/argument order with Racket. Nothing else makes
> sense.)
* I take this point as a reason that static ty
Interesting point. With types, this issue just goes away.
(No matter what, I argue that Lazy should be totally compatible
in contracts/types/argument order with Racket. Nothing else
makes sense.)
On Jan 30, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> The lazy `take' has another reason to retu
5 matches
Mail list logo
