Re: [racket-dev] [Crash report] DrRacket v5.1 crashed on Mac OS X Lion (10.7 preview)

2011-05-07 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
I get it too. I'm just updating to lion p2r2, and will install Xcode 4.1 Developer Preview 4. Have you had any luck? The only thing I'm going to vary from the normal build instructions is to specify 64 bit as per * Under Mac OS X 10.6 and later, `configure' by default selects 32-bit mode for

Re: [racket-dev] [Crash report] DrRacket v5.1 crashed on Mac OS X Lion (10.7 preview)

2011-05-07 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
I get it too. I'm just updating to lion p2r2, and will install Xcode 4.1 Developer Preview 4. Have you had any luck? The only thing I'm going to vary from the normal build instructions is to specify 64 bit as per * Under Mac OS X 10.6 and later, `configure' by default selects 32-bit mode for

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
6 hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Right now, we're already using JS to decide which of the 3 initial > code snippets to display. We're using it for more -- to flip through the examples. Most of these browsers won't even use the CSS so things that should be hidden are not. So the change I

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-07 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Right now, we're already using JS to decide which of the 3 initial code snippets to display. So, why not start with using Noel's tool for that, and go from there? We already have a built-in group of possibilities to measure, and we're already using JavaScript. As an aside, I suspect that non-Jav

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-07 Thread Noel Welsh
You have to contact the Myna server somehow to get suggestions. You can do this via the server or via the client, with the usual tradeoffs. I would go with the JS client as it's much faster to set up, and code the HTML in such a way that it still works if JS is disabled. (This is straightforward, a

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
Do you mean that it requires JS to work? What about non-JS browsers? (There are some people who find it important -- I've even made some changes to the front page to make it friendlier to text browsers.) On 2011-05-07, Noel Welsh wrote: > Sure does. We have a Javascript client. (All the API docs

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-07 Thread Noel Welsh
That's basically correct. Rather than randomly choosing which description to display, Myna chooses the description that best balances estimated quality and uncertainty in that estimate. N. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > The technology Noel is suggesting randomly cho

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-07 Thread Noel Welsh
Sure does. We have a Javascript client. (All the API docs *should* be visible to everyone, but currently you need a login to read them. It was simpler to implement things this way, and we're in the process of changing to a more friendly system.) N. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Eli Barzilay wr