On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
I introduced templates today. Almost as if on cue, one student asked
whether he could use else instead of (cons? l). I told them I was
going to make a MORAL judgment about why it was EVIL, and spent ten
minutes talking about all that
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:42:10AM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two days ago, James Vega wrote:
> >
> > Since I've generally had more luck using the cgc GC on less
> > mainstream systems, I set the build to use that for PowerPC and let
> > it be in case things changed and it started working.
>
>
On 09/16/2011 09:04 PM, John Clements wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:06 PM, John Clements wrote:
I'm trying to backport working FFI code to 5.1.3, and I'm having trouble
referring to elements of a C struct. Specifically, in the presence of this
definition
(define-cstruct _rack-audio-closure
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:44:50 -0600, Kevin Tew wrote:
> If you would like document the fact that cstructs are generative only up
> to version 5.1.3. I think that improve the docs.
I think the right next step is for you (Kevin) to update
"doc/release-notes/racket/HISTORY.txt" to describe the chang
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:10:44 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> mips and ia64 both fail with unaligned access, although in different
> places.
>
> ia64's build failure
I think Racket won't work on ia64 because we never worked out how to
deal with its multiple stacks.
> mips' build failure
>
> ,
It looks like the call in C might have been in a thread other than the
thread where Racket was started. In that case, when scheme_post_sema()
tries to cooperate with the GC, then it would end up with a NULL
pointer for the Racket GC information of the current thread.
In particular, since you're as
On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> It looks like the call in C might have been in a thread other than the
> thread where Racket was started. In that case, when scheme_post_sema()
> tries to cooperate with the GC, then it would end up with a NULL
> pointer for the Racket GC inform
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 07:53:28AM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:10:44 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > mips and ia64 both fail with unaligned access, although in different
> > places.
> >
> > ia64's build failure
>
> I think Racket won't work on ia64 iecause we never worked ou
I'll do that.
Kevin
On 09/17/2011 07:53 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:44:50 -0600, Kevin Tew wrote:
If you would like document the fact that cstructs are generative only up
to version 5.1.3. I think that improve the docs.
I think the right next step is for you (Kevin) to upd
Disregard unless interested: crash while running program, drracket
#8e5bb730b369b169821695e1b3216d68a8d71d64 from Friday 16th.
Process: racket [11531]
Path:/Users/clements/plt/bin/racket
Identifier: racket
Version: ??? (???)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent
I think you are missing a test case here.
Robby
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:39 PM, wrote:
> gmarceau has updated `master' from 14014b3d36 to 9b49de16e7.
> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/14014b3d36..9b49de16e7
>
> =[ 1 Commits ]==
>
> Direct
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Whoops, I see we lost the mailing list at some point in this thread.
We're back now.
> If the former, then those are the directories that DrRacket
> intentionally doens't compile (and those are the ones that I'd expect
> you to have multi
12 matches
Mail list logo
