Re: [racket-dev] advice on linking against racket in windows

2011-10-08 Thread John Clements
On Oct 8, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:41:52 -0700, John Clements wrote: >> >> On Oct 8, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> >>> At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:28:58 -0700, John Clements wrote: I'm building cross-platform binaries, and one of my platforms i

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Robby Findler
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > > > I assume you mean the context > > (define number? >  (let ((old number?)) >    (lambda (any) >      (displayln `(I am testing ,any)) >      (old any Of course I didn't. What a

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Oct 8, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Robby Findler wrote: I assume you mean the context (define number? (let ((old number?)) (lambda (any) (displayln `(I am testing ,any)) (old any > This expression: > > (match x > [`(lambda (,x) ,e) ...] > [(? number?) ...] > [`(,e1 ,e2)

Re: [racket-dev] advice on linking against racket in windows

2011-10-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:41:52 -0700, John Clements wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > > At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:28:58 -0700, John Clements wrote: > >> I'm building cross-platform binaries, and one of my platforms is Windows. > >> > >> Moreover, I'm calling mzrt_sema pri

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Robby Findler
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > >>> >>> I doubt that this applies but I am willing to look at >>> counter-examples. >> >> One has been discussed in this thread. I think Sam promised to look >> into seeing how well i

Re: [racket-dev] advice on linking against racket in windows

2011-10-08 Thread John Clements
On Oct 8, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:28:58 -0700, John Clements wrote: >> I'm building cross-platform binaries, and one of my platforms is Windows. >> >> Moreover, I'm calling mzrt_sema primitives from my library, but those are >> the >> only Racket functio

Re: [racket-dev] advice on linking against racket in windows

2011-10-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:28:58 -0700, John Clements wrote: > I'm building cross-platform binaries, and one of my platforms is Windows. > > Moreover, I'm calling mzrt_sema primitives from my library, but those are the > only Racket functions I'm calling. The main problem is that the mzrt_ functions

[racket-dev] advice on linking against racket in windows

2011-10-08 Thread John Clements
I'm building cross-platform binaries, and one of my platforms is Windows. Moreover, I'm calling mzrt_sema primitives from my library, but those are the only Racket functions I'm calling. I can think of at least three possible approaches to this, and if someone can give me 30 seconds of advice,

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> I doubt that this applies but I am willing to look at >> counter-examples. > > One has been discussed in this thread. I think Sam promised to look > into seeing how well it applies to our implementation. Sorry, I skipped some messages.

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Robby Findler
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthias Felleisen >> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: >>> Okay. I think it is strange, but feel free to do th

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthias Felleisen > wrote: >> >> On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: >> >>> Okay. I think it is strange, but feel free to do that and revert my >>> change. Apologies for the confusion. > >> I th

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Robby Findler
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > >> Okay. I think it is strange, but feel free to do that and revert my >> change. Apologies for the confusion. > I think you shouldn't apologize here. I am unhappy that match > doesn'

Re: [racket-dev] racket/match is broken

2011-10-08 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > Okay. I think it is strange, but feel free to do that and revert my > change. Apologies for the confusion. I think you shouldn't apologize here. I am unhappy that match doesn't guarantee order of matching in a list. The entire reason I use list

Re: [racket-dev] open untagged files in blank language level?

2011-10-08 Thread Robby Findler
Okay, here's what I've done for the upcoming release. (It is a kind-of patch on the existing setup, but perhaps that's appropriate, since the right long-term solution is to move everything to #lang.) When a file is opened, and the language that would have been used is a language that returns non-

[racket-dev] PLaneT and proxies

2011-10-08 Thread Norman Gray
Greetings. A while ago, there was a discussion on users, which moved to dev, about PLaneT's support for HTTP proxies. http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2010-June/039949.html http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/2010-June/003496.html Reading through that thread now, I see that it i