Ryan Culpepper writes:
> * Mike Sperber
> - DMdA Tests
> - Stepper Tests
> - Signature Tests
Done.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour and a half ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I imagine it would work as by having an alternative to "run"
An hour and a half ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> >>
> >> I imagine it would work as by having an alternative to "run" that
> >> would just put you somehow into level 1.
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> That sounds cool to me. Now that I think about it, I think we used to
>> have something like this (it was a mixin tied to a specific language,
>> not something that worked for all
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> That sounds cool to me. Now that I think about it, I think we used to
> have something like this (it was a mixin tied to a specific language,
> not something that worked for all #lang languages) but it was back
> before we had the macro system t
That sounds cool to me. Now that I think about it, I think we used to
have something like this (it was a mixin tied to a specific language,
not something that worked for all #lang languages) but it was back
before we had the macro system to support it, I think.
I imagine it would work as by having
A few minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> The first step would be a compile-time IO console.
>
> The second step would be a compile-time interaction mode.
> This would fit right in with Ryan's past work. It would mean
> compile the Def Window (as in CS) and make for-syntax values
> avail
The first step would be a compile-time IO console.
The second step would be a compile-time interaction mode.
This would fit right in with Ryan's past work. It would mean
compile the Def Window (as in CS) and make for-syntax values
available at the repl for experimentation. Then again, I might
With a REPL? That's a lot more than I had been thinking about. I'm not
sure how to do it, either.
Robby
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> May I propose a compile-time interaction window in drracket? -- Matthias
>
>
>
> On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote
May I propose a compile-time interaction window in drracket? -- Matthias
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Well, when you do IO at compile time there isn't really a good place
> to put it (at least not at the moment) so instead of making a good
> place to put it, I just let i
Well, when you do IO at compile time there isn't really a good place
to put it (at least not at the moment) so instead of making a good
place to put it, I just let it go to drracket's stdout. Probably
reasonable to consider this a bug.
Robby
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wr
Yeap, I have live CS running all the time. Interesting effect.
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Probably when you were running check syntax? (Or maybe when it was
> being run for you?)
>
> Robby
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> I am
Probably when you were running check syntax? (Or maybe when it was
being run for you?)
Robby
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> I am running the silly program below (no meaning), and on occasion I see the
> output of the *** line in the console from where I launched
I am running the silly program below (no meaning), and on occasion I see the
output of the *** line in the console from where I launched drracket. 5.2.0.1
from 10/16
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
(define-for-syntax (postfix stx word stem)
(datum->syntax stx (string->sym
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> * Casey Klein
> - Redex Tests
> Updates:
> - Redex Updates: update HISTORY
> (updates should show v5.2 as the most current version; email me
> to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
> changes.)
>
Don
On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Stephen Bloch
> - Picturing Programs Tests
Passed.
Stephen Bloch
sbl...@adelphi.edu
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Marijn wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Robby,
>
> On 10/18/11 17:58, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Marijn wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 10/18/11 14:09, Robby Findler w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robby,
On 10/18/11 17:58, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Marijn wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/18/11 14:09, Robby Findler wrote:
>>> Oh, and one more comment: did you try clicking on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/11 17:10, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:32:54 +0200, Marijn wrote:
>> the attached program draws a grid in a canvas and paints a few of
>> the cells so created. When resizing the window, the grid is also
>> dynamically resized
19 matches
Mail list logo
