Actually, besides the obvious backwards incompatibility issues, does
it make sense to put all those \usepackage{}s (all the stuff before
the %%s) into scribble-style.tex (the default style.tex), so that
specifying a --style argument would drop them?
Robby
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Robb
I think the most expedient thing is to add an option so that
render-one method in latex-render.rkt doesn't include scribble-tex (or
includes a replacement that you specify).
I don't know what the right general purpose fix would be, but it would
be nice if that fix also had the property that scribb
Given that I have an existing paper in Scribble, which I need to get
into this format, which of the following would be
easiest/prettiest/most useful for the future?
- writing a new renderer
- generalizing the existing latex renderer
- hacking prefix.tex (although I don't see how this would work)
I think you could probably make it work with a replacement
"prefix.tex", although it won't be easy or pretty.
At Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:43:24 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> Yes, I believe that is not possible without creating a new renderer.
>
> Robby
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Sam Tobin-H
Yes, I believe that is not possible without creating a new renderer.
Robby
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> I'd like to create a language in Scribble from writing papers
> according to the `acmsmall' documentclass. Unfortunately, the guide
> for this documentclass s
I'd like to create a language in Scribble from writing papers
according to the `acmsmall' documentclass. Unfortunately, the guide
for this documentclass says, right at the beginning:
Following order is mandatory to generate a correct title page:
\documentclass{acmsmall}
%\acmVolume{V}
%\acmNumbe
As an immediate solution, I suggest simply not trying to use R6RS
compatibility libraries with Racket, and instead just use the Racket
language. Spend your energy on your application. (I don't want to get
into why right now, but my book will have an entire section or chapter
entitled "Don't U
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Marijn wrote:
>
> regexp-split produces an immutable cons when rnrs/base-6 is required:
`regexp-split' is still being obtained from `racket/base' in this example:
> $ echo "m" | racket -e '(require rnrs/base-6) (car (regexp-split " +"
> (read-line (current-input-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
regexp-split produces an immutable cons when rnrs/base-6 is required:
$ echo "m" | racket -e '(require rnrs/base-6) (car (regexp-split " +"
(read-line (current-input-port
'mcar: expects argument of type ; given '("m")
but
$ echo "m" | racke
9 matches
Mail list logo
