Re: [racket-dev] Missing pregexp syntax in Racket

2011-11-26 Thread Pauan
Sorry for the butchered e-mail, I was quite careful to send it in plain textmode, so I don't know how that happened. _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Missing pregexp syntax in Racket

2011-11-26 Thread Pauan
It was brought up that my explanation was confusing, and I agree it is. So I'll try again. The following should return #t: (regexp-match? #px"\\u{E0}" "\u00E0")(regexp-match? "\\X" "\u00E0")(regexp-match? "\\u00E0"    "\u00E0")(regexp-match? "\\x00"    "\x00")(regexp-match? "\\n"        "\n")(regex

[racket-dev] Missing pregexp syntax in Racket

2011-11-26 Thread Pauan
Racket pregexp syntax is currently missing the following: #px"X"-> a single Unicode grapheme #px"u[a-fA-F0-9]{4}" -> hexidecimal Unicode escapes #px"u\\{[a-fA-F0-9]{1,4}\\}" -> hexidecimal Unicode escapes #px"x[a-fA-F0-9]{2}" -> \x escapes

Re: [racket-dev] generating tex with a different component order from Scribble

2011-11-26 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:53:11 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Given that I have an existing paper in Scribble, which I need to get > into this format, which of the following would be > easiest/prettiest/most useful for the future? > > - writing a new renderer > - generalizing the existing latex