Robby Findler writes:
> [ moved to dev ]
>
> Apparently this broke somewhere in between v5.0 (June 2010) where it
> works and v5.1 (Feb 2011) where it doesn't. I can't use git bisect to
> find the precise commit because the earlier version doesn't compile on
> either my windows or my mac machine
i'll take a stab at clarifying.
there was some discussion on irc about being able to represent regexpes
using less escaping.
it was suggested that we could have something similar to perl, ruby,
javascript and other languages for specifying a regexp pattern, something
like #rx/pattern/
so for exampl
Turns out that this commit was part of the problem. I didn't udpate
all of the uses of those preferences properly.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> Does anyone know how to grep backwards through the
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:35:57PM -0800, Pauan wrote:
> It was brought up that my explanation was confusing, and I agree it is.
> So I'll try again. The following should return #t:
...
> (regexp-match? "\\n" "\n")
I am confused about a number of things in your emails, so for simplicity
I'm
Apparently, disabling the tests with version 5.0 successfully disables
them with version 5.1 and the latest in git. Of course, attempting to
re-enable them in the later versions has no effect on the actual
tests, but re-enabling them with 5.0 does.
So I guess that's a clue. :)
Robby
_
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> Okay. Thanks, Sam and Eric.
>>
>> It appears that in 5.1 check-expect didn't work at all (is that
>> possible?!) so I guess that trying to look through the history to find
>>
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Okay. Thanks, Sam and Eric.
>
> It appears that in 5.1 check-expect didn't work at all (is that
> possible?!) so I guess that trying to look through the history to find
> something helpful is probably a waste of time.
That seems hard to bel
Okay. Thanks, Sam and Eric.
It appears that in 5.1 check-expect didn't work at all (is that
possible?!) so I guess that trying to look through the history to find
something helpful is probably a waste of time.
And, FWIW, the commit I did below could have been the source of
problems, as it changes
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Does anyone know how to grep backwards through the history of a file, using
> git?
I'd do this:
% cd collects/test-engine
% git log -p -Senable .
where 'enable' might be something else.
However, that exact query shows that either you br
I think you want "git log -Ssought -- path/to/file"
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Does anyone know how to grep backwards through the history of a file, using
> git?
>
> Robby
> _
> For list-related administrative tasks:
>
Does anyone know how to grep backwards through the history of a file, using git?
Robby
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
[ moved to dev ]
Apparently this broke somewhere in between v5.0 (June 2010) where it
works and v5.1 (Feb 2011) where it doesn't. I can't use git bisect to
find the precise commit because the earlier version doesn't compile on
either my windows or my mac machine (mac is lion and windows uses too
n
On 11/27/2011 01:28 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
Thanks for taking this on, Neil!
:)
No no, that's just from back before we had alpha bitmaps. Please get rid of it!
Roger roger. Just loading them with 'png/alpha seems to work fine. Cool.
2
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Moving to dev.
>
> 16x16 is tiny! But I can see why. I've attached my current toolbar, which
> uses all 22px icons. They look a bit big.
(In case you're tempted, I'd like to avoid another option :)
> I'm doing more than just replacing icons.
Moving to dev.
16x16 is tiny! But I can see why. I've attached my current toolbar,
which uses all 22px icons. They look a bit big.
I'm doing more than just replacing icons. We need abstractions. Not
having them is partly why DrRacket's icon set looks old and
inconsistent. So here's what I've
15 matches
Mail list logo
