On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I think that a minor variation on Neil's strategy should not be too
> difficult to do (but I'll certainly agree that it is not an ideal
> situation). What you'd do is first just download (via the "Bam" method
> below :) the planet packages yo
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> It's good to see interest in Racket from cloud people. Feel free to ask
> lots of questions on the Racket "users" and "dev" email lists as you work
> through your solution.
Well, this a side-interest for personally, but *anyone* can make a
Thanks!
At Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:45:01 -0500 (EST), "J. Ian Johnson" wrote:
> I'm not set up to make a pull request on this computer, but core.scrbl needs
> to
> add an "s" to make "contents" the field name for multiarg-element, not
> "content".
> -Ian
_
Racket Develope
I'm not set up to make a pull request on this computer, but core.scrbl needs to
add an "s" to make "contents" the field name for multiarg-element, not
"content".
-Ian
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Another variation, if you're thinking about cloud infrastructure today:
you could pretty easily make your own faux PLaneT server that either is
for a single app or takes the identity/profile of the app as part of the
URL the app uses to access the PLaneT server.
The faux server can be a tiny H
Now that I'm a whiny junior dev, does that mean I can do the +/-1 thing?
Because after reading Eli's argument - particularly the symmetry
arguments - I'm totally +1-ing his proposal.
This is one of the last places I find myself using the (let () ...)
idiom. (The others are `define-syntax-rule'
7 hours ago, Marijn wrote:
>
> On 30-12-11 09:32, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> >> Without the capturing group the results are identical: [...]
> >
> > Which is expected.
>
> Good, just establishing a baseline here, but it is good that some
> compatibility is *expected*.
I meant that getting the sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-12-11 09:32, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> This doesn't look like an issue that is related to guile, just that
> he chose python as the goal... The first other random example I
> tried was `split-string' in Emacs, which did the same thing as
> Racket.
I was against it for similar reasons, but the question is whether
there's a technical point that makes it a bad choice.
As for making errors: I changed my mind when I though about the
symmetry argument -- using the same argument, I'd expect to do the
exact same kind of mistakes with functions, but
Yesterday, Marijn wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> this just appeared on guile-devel, but it seems to have exposed a bug
> in racket.
>
> On 29-12-11 10:32, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> > [...]
This doesn't look like an issue that is related to guile, just that he
ch
10 matches
Mail list logo
