11 hours ago, Michael W wrote:
> I'm no graphics designer but I've been playing with Eli's logo a
> bit. I went gradient-happy; sorry. [...]
I've added them to the sequence in my directory -- start from
http://tmp.barzilay.org/logo/whitesilver-subtle-=-ipage.html
and hit right to go in sequenc
On Feb 15, 2012, at 5:33 AM, David Van Horn wrote:
> On 2/15/12 8:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-02-14 09:58:12 -0800, John Clements wrote:
I sent an e-mail to Asumu about a week ago that sneakily tried to get him
On 02/15/2012 12:21 PM, John Clements wrote:
On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Michael W wrote:
I'm no graphics designer but I've been playing with Eli's logo a
bit. I went gradient-happy; sorry.
Here it is with a silvery sheen:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/219506/racket-logo/whitesilver-subtle.png
L
On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Michael W wrote:
> I'm no graphics designer but I've been playing with Eli's logo a
> bit. I went gradient-happy; sorry.
>
> Here it is with a silvery sheen:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/219506/racket-logo/whitesilver-subtle.png
>
> Less subtle, darker silver:
> http:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/219506/racket-logo/circle-bluewhite.png
Thanks You! I would love it if Neil and John put their mind to the above and
turned into something they like.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I'm no graphics designer but I've been playing with Eli's logo a
bit. I went gradient-happy; sorry.
Here it is with a silvery sheen:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/219506/racket-logo/whitesilver-subtle.png
Less subtle, darker silver:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/219506/racket-logo/silver.png
I've been exper
Greetings.
On 2012 Feb 14, at 20:37, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Here's the deal, though. This one, even just the "lambda r." in a circle, is
> pushing complexity. We've been approaching logo design too much like language
> design, trying to cram as much semantic content as possible into a small
>
On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I tried a whole bunch of things with the version I suggested earlier,
> but they all suffer from looking like they're trying too much. (There
> were also similar suggestions, like the pregnant lambda, or the cult
> symbol, or the mirrored-2 sym
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:33 AM, David Van Horn wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/12 8:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>>>
On 2012-02-14 09:58:12 -0800, John Clements wrote:
> I sent
On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> A
>> logo exists primarily to make a good impression on outsiders.
>> Filling it with too much meaning works actively against this.
I second this too.
And I actually do like Eli's direction. But it does need color.
__
On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:33 AM, David Van Horn wrote:
> On 2/15/12 8:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-02-14 09:58:12 -0800, John Clements wrote:
I sent an e-mail to Asumu about a week ago that sneakily tried to get him
Yesterday, Neil Toronto wrote:
> I decided to play with this one a bit. I used PLT's lambda, put the "r"
> in the same style, and then made it into a "lambda r.acket" banner.
>
> Here's the deal, though. This one, even just the "lambda r." in a
> circle, is pushing complexity. We've been approach
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 14:39, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
>>
>> oops. I have not tried sending this report with this version of
>> DrRacket. I was remembering the behaviour of previous versions.
>>
>> Should I try to file this report to check if it's working for me?
Just now, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
>
> oops. I have not tried sending this report with this version of
> DrRacket. I was remembering the behaviour of previous versions.
>
> Should I try to file this report to check if it's working for me?
Please do -- it shouldn't do anything other than web st
You misunderstood. I don't want the poor dr to open any port or communicate
with the outside. I want an option like in PDF previewers that says "send this
info out via a mail client" and puts all the info into Mail.
On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Matthias Felle
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 14:29, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:30 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
>>
>> > (for company firewall reasons I cannot use the bug report
>> > facility. Please bear with me).
>>
>> Perhaps we should have an option in Dr
On 2/15/12 8:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2012-02-14 09:58:12 -0800, John Clements wrote:
I sent an e-mail to Asumu about a week ago that sneakily tried to get him to
take responsibility, and it sounds like he might be on it. If not,
Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:30 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
>
> > (for company firewall reasons I cannot use the bug report
> > facility. Please bear with me).
>
> Perhaps we should have an option in DrRacket that collects the bug
> report information but then
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2012-02-14 09:58:12 -0800, John Clements wrote:
>> I sent an e-mail to Asumu about a week ago that sneakily tried to get him to
>> take responsibility, and it sounds like he might be on it. If not, I'll take
>> the lead. Asumu?
>
> I'm
If I'm reading the expansion right, it looks like 'match' is keeping
only one of the 'foo's in the output (it seems to put one of them in
the disappeared use property on the 'foo?' in the (if (foo? x) ...)
that it generates).
In other words, looks like a bug in match.
Robby
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012
On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:30 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> (for company firewall reasons I cannot use the bug report facility.
> Please bear with me).
Perhaps we should have an option in DrRacket that collects the bug report
information but then places it in a mail buffer for the programmer. --
Hello,
(for company firewall reasons I cannot use the bug report facility.
Please bear with me).
Racket version 5.2.1;
Environment: windows "Windows NT 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1"
(win32\i386\3m) (get-display-depth) = 32;
If I put the following text in a buffer:
#lang racket
(struct
22 matches
Mail list logo