Re: [racket-dev] Build failures since 5.2

2012-02-19 Thread Matthew Flatt
Thanks for tracking this down! Compiling with `-funisgned-char' on my machine produced the same error. I've corrected the problem (pushed to the git repo) and added a release-time checklist item to try compiling with `-funisgned-char'. At Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:17:36 -0500, James McCoy wrote: > Hi a

[racket-dev] Formlets and POST

2012-02-19 Thread Norman Gray
Greetings. Web-server formlets currently send their form input back to the server via an HTTP GET request. They should probably generate a form which uses HTTP POST instead. There are two problems with using GET for this. 1. If there's any sensitive information in the form, such as a passwor

Re: [racket-dev] new logo

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
I for one like both designs a lot. On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:09 AM, Neil Toronto wrote: > On 02/18/2012 08:49 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> An hour ago, Neil Toronto wrote: >> That's why after several attempts to connect the paren to the rest of >> the "R" I went back to Michael's original thing and

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Robby Findler > wrote: >> How about: >> >> Not enough languages in your life? >> Download Racket and add a few hundred more. > > I like this a lot. The above means "Racket is one of many languages,

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> Or, with the Matthias theme: >> I want YOU to build your own language [1] > > > Much much better. We should re-work PLAI/EOPL to exploit this, turn into a Guide to the Metahitchiker's Guide. _ Racket Devel

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > >>> Or, with the Matthias theme: >>> I want YOU to build your own language [1] >> >> >> Much much better. > > > We should re-work PLAI/EOPL to exploit this, turn into a Gui

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Eli Barzilay
Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > >> Or, with the Matthias theme: > >> I want YOU to build your own language [1] > > > > Much much better. > > We should re-work PLAI/EOPL to exploit this, turn into a Guide to > the Metahitchiker

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
I viewed it on my phone (ie, slow) on a 2G connection (ie, even slower). I suggest trying to simulate the experience because the layers draw one by one. About half way through, the person looks like Lothar from the Mandrake comics. I will not dwell on similarities to the final picture. -- Pardon

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Jay McCarthy
Awesome On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> >> On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> >> >> Or, with the Matthias theme: >> >> I want YOU to build your own language [1] >> > >> > Much much better. >> >> We should re-wo

Re: [racket-dev] Is anybody else getting this error?

2012-02-19 Thread Sean Reque
Neil Toronto writes: > > This is from the latest release. On Redex errors and some Typed Racket > errors (so far), I get something like > > exception raised by error display handler: normalize-path: > # (within the input path) is not a directory or > does not exist; original exception raised

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Neil Toronto
Beat me to it. +2 On 02/19/2012 01:26 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: Awesome On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote: On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: Or, with the Matthias theme: I want YOU to build your own language [1]

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Robby Findler
This is just fantastic. Robby On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: > Beat me to it. > > +2 > > > On 02/19/2012 01:26 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: >> >> Awesome >> >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Eli Barzilay  wrote: >>> >>> Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote: On Fe

Re: [racket-dev] Possible promotional poster (with apologies to Matthias)

2012-02-19 Thread Eli Barzilay
(BTW, I have the XCF file, in case anyone wants to use it with some other text... or some other person...) An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote: > This is just fantastic. > > Robby > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: > > Beat me to it. > > > > +2 > > > > > > On 02/19/2012 01:

Re: [racket-dev] An Improvement to for/set

2012-02-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
for/set sounds and looks more uniform with the rest of the loops, no? union you can throw in as a function or for/fold. On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:30 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote: > I would prefer a simpler for/union: > > (define-syntax (for/union stx) > (syntax-case stx () >[(_ clauses . body)