On Friday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, to support breaking after the current element, I'm trying
> out `#:final'. A `#:final' clause is like `#:break', except that it
> ends the loop after the next run of the body. [...]
(When I first saw this, I thought that it was a kind of a "the value
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I wasn't able to replicate the crash. Does it happen consistently for
> you in v5.3? In v5.3.0.24?
>
It's consistent for me in 5.3. I can come in the morning with the laptop
to show you.
_
Racket Developers list:
I wasn't able to replicate the crash. Does it happen consistently for
you in v5.3? In v5.3.0.24?
At Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:07:43 -0600, Danny Yoo wrote:
> I'm seeing weirdness when trying to import Dave Herman's memoize
> package on Racket 5.3:
>
> ;;;
> > (require (planet dherman/memoize:3:
At Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:48:06 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Is the following interaction the expected behavior here or is it a bug?
>
> Welcome to Racket v5.3.0.24.
> -> (module foo racket (define x 0) (provide x))
> -> (require 'foo)
> -> x
> 0
> -> (module foo racket (module* bar #f (define x 1)
4 matches
Mail list logo
