Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25474: master branch updated

2012-10-15 Thread Neil Toronto
2c56ace Matthew Flatt 2012-10-15 05:54 : | JIT-inline structure allocation | | For simple structure types (no guards, no auto fields, no | procedure property). Inlined allocation makes structure | allocation a little faster; more significantly, it | make structure allocation future-safe. Nice!

[racket-dev] module mismatch with .zos

2012-10-15 Thread Dan Liebgold
We're having trouble with .zos. We trigger the "module mismatch, probably from old bytecode whose dependencies have changed: " error on occasion and I'm not sure why. Can someone explain possible solutions? We distribute the Racket install and our own code with .zos and it works for most everyone,

Re: [racket-dev] module mismatch with .zos

2012-10-15 Thread Matthew Flatt
Is there any chance that the ".zo" file timestamps became earlier than the ".rkt" timestamps on end-users' machines? Users are better off with the ".dep" files. I think `raco make' would use them, for example. At Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:10:18 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote: > We're having trouble with .zo

Re: [racket-dev] gc much slower in DrR?

2012-10-15 Thread Matthew Flatt
Any difference with 9dd83008a6 (just pushed)? At Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:43:49 -0700, John Clements wrote: > I'm trying to run signal-based audio programs, and I'm finding that DrR is > using well over 10x the time to perform the same GC's as command-line racket. > Let me be more specific: I'm runni

Re: [racket-dev] module mismatch with .zos

2012-10-15 Thread Dan Liebgold
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Is there any chance that the ".zo" file timestamps became earlier than > the ".rkt" timestamps on end-users' machines? > > Yes that is possible... we're distributing using Perforce, which timestamps files at the time of syncing. Would that g

Re: [racket-dev] module mismatch with .zos

2012-10-15 Thread Robby Findler
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> >> Is there any chance that the ".zo" file timestamps became earlier than >> the ".rkt" timestamps on end-users' machines? >> > > Yes that is possible... we're distributing using Perfor

[racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.3.1

2012-10-15 Thread Ryan Culpepper
Checklist items for the v5.3.1 release (using the v5.3.0.900 release candidate build) Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes ar