Re: [racket-dev] chaperones in 5.3.1?

2012-10-26 Thread Danny Yoo
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > The browser is Firefox Nightly, and my fixes are on master now. Ok, I can confirm that my test suite is running on master ok now. The thing you saw may be firefox-specific: I'll have to try that later. But at the very least, I'm not g

Re: [racket-dev] chaperones in 5.3.1?

2012-10-26 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
The browser is Firefox Nightly, and my fixes are on master now. Sam On Oct 26, 2012 1:15 PM, "Danny Yoo" wrote: > > I ran the above, and it seemed to work well, until I got to the > > "conform.rkt" test, when it spewed a *lot* of output like this: > > > > _62969@http://localhost:8371/eval:4681 >

Re: [racket-dev] chaperones in 5.3.1?

2012-10-26 Thread Danny Yoo
> I ran the above, and it seemed to work well, until I got to the > "conform.rkt" test, when it spewed a *lot* of output like this: > > _62969@http://localhost:8371/eval:4681 > _63082@http://localhost:8371/eval:2199 > _63901@http://localhost:8371/eval:6925 > _63932@http://localhost:8371/eval:6052 >

Re: [racket-dev] Performance regression testing?

2012-10-26 Thread Jay McCarthy
Generally, I look at the DrDr timing graphs and the run-length overall. The first is good for discrete tests that do benchmarking (such as tests/racket/benchmarks and tests/racket/stress) or are very expensive, like the TR tests. The second is good when Matthew does some VM-level optimization---for

[racket-dev] Performance regression testing?

2012-10-26 Thread Tony Garnock-Jones
Hi all, I have a speculative change to match that I'd like to propose, but before I do I'd like to make sure it has no negative performance impact. How do people go about checking for performance regressions in core racket collections? Is there a standard benchmark suite? Regards, Tony __