I don't mind and I anticipate that planet2 will have more network traffic
per push.
Is there something in particular you're worried about?
Even though Matthew is very productive, I think it will be a while until
his activity causes DrDr to mount a denial-of-service attack.
Jay
On Fri, Nov 2,
Just now, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I don't mind and I anticipate that planet2 will have more network
traffic per push.
Is there something in particular you're worried about?
Even though Matthew is very productive, I think it will be a while
until his activity causes DrDr to mount a
It just failed for me so I wasn't sure if it was really a very reliable test.
But I don't know what it is trying to test, actually, so maybe
everything is fine.
Robby
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mind and I anticipate that planet2 will have
If we just want to test HTTPS, then another option is to always run a
trusted HTTPS server (like Apache) on DrDr and have it contact that... so
it doesn't rely on the real network. (That is, if we don't want to have the
test spawn a Racket implemented HTTPS server.)
Jay
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at
Right, something like that was my thinking. Seems a little bit more
reliable test. But if it isn't a problem, then I don't want to make it
be one.
Robby
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
If we just want to test HTTPS, then another option is to always run
Yesterday, Diogo F. S. Ramos wrote:
Adding multiple streams feature to stream-map makes it more in line
with its list counterpart. [...]
The code in your patch had several problems, so I started re-hacking
it, yet again. I obviously wrote a macro so I can knock out
`stream-for-each',
6 matches
Mail list logo
