`zip' gathers together each element of each list, in order, returning
a list of those elements.
For example: (zip (list 4 2) (list 3 5)) => '((4 3) (2 5))
Every list has to have the same length.
---
There was talk in the IRC about implementing a `zip' procedure. Here
is my try.
Unfortunately I s
On Nov 8, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>>
>> * I think the places you use 'PLT' in the documentation should be
>> replace with 'Racket maintainers' -- PLT is a research group with lots
>> of overlap with the Racket maintainers.
>
> Sure.
I disagree with Sam. Racket is owned by PLT Des
This is on the long term list in the docs.
Jay
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012/11/08, at 17:59, Carl Eastlund wrote:
Perhaps we want a GUI Planet2 installation tool? And options for
auto-install from DrRacket to be silent, confirm/cancel, or auto-fail?
That would give us the range from full manua
That sounds great. I imagine we'd run online check syntax in "auto
fail but put a button into the GUI" mode. That seems like an easy
decision. Maybe the default for Run would be confirm/cancel dialog box
with a "don't ask again" button or something. (I imagine it would
actually be "auto-fail" but w
Perhaps we want a GUI Planet2 installation tool? And options for
auto-install from DrRacket to be silent, confirm/cancel, or auto-fail?
That would give us the range from full manual control to automatic
"Something Good happens", all without command lines.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:
I think it is important that you can get a program from the web, put
it into DrRacket, hit run, and get Something Good to happen, without
having to go type at command lines and whatnot. (This is especially
true for Windows, the platform something like 95% of our users use.)
Robby
On Thu, Nov 8, 2
rote:
>
>> Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release
>> of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
>>
>> I've tried to answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2
>> in
>> the documentation, which I've u
>
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:16:58 +0100, Jay McCarthy
> wrote:
>
> Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release
>> of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
>>
>> I've tried to answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2
a copy of here:
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/20121108-pkgs/planet2/index.html
In particular, it explains what the plan is to go from this beta release
to
the final release.
If you currently have packages on Planet 1, I am excited to help you make
the transition to Planet 2. (I am c
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
[replying just to a few of these]
>> * I think we should drop the `.plt` archive format entirely.
>
> It is the default because Racket can create it and unarchive it
> natively.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 30 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> > IIUC, the branch in the path is required, is that the case? If
>> > so, then I think that it should really work without it too, to get
>> > the simple https://github.com/user/repo syntax.
>>
>> Yes it i
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> > * I think tying to GitHub is a mistake -- the system should work
>> > for for arbitrary Git repositories. Having a short syntax for
>> > github is great, though. Additionally, we should support fixing
30 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> > IIUC, the branch in the path is required, is that the case? If
> > so, then I think that it should really work without it too, to get
> > the simple https://github.com/user/repo syntax.
>
> Yes it is required. We could do that, right now there's not
> assum
20 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> > * I think tying to GitHub is a mistake -- the system should work
> > for for arbitrary Git repositories. Having a short syntax for
> > github is great, though. Additionally, we should support fixing a
> > checksum for a package. The npm docs have a similar
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Jay: do you prefer off-line commentage?
No, this is fine.
> Meanwhile, I'll re-use some of Sam's text (I generally +1 all items
> that I have omitted):
I won't respond to points that I feel were answered re: Sam.
> 20 minutes ago, Sam Tobi
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release of
>> Planet 2 to the Racket core.
>
> Here, as promised, more detailed but small comments. I have one
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
>> * We really need valid SSL certificates for any user-facing sites.
>> StartSSL gives them away for free: http://www.startssl.com/
>
> (Last time I looked, free SSLs weren't ones that would get trusted by
> default popular browsers. If you'r
Jay: do you prefer off-line commentage?
Meanwhile, I'll re-use some of Sam's text (I generally +1 all items
that I have omitted):
20 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> * I think tying to GitHub is a mistake -- the system should work for
> for arbitrary Git repositories.
I very much ag
Two hours ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> 5 hours ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
> > Somewhat small change. But it was low-hanging fruit, and I needed
> > to make some kind of progress. :)
>
> Last time I benchmarked this kind of IO, u
On 2012-11-08 06:16:58 -0700, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta
>release of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
Very nice! I'll provide some feedback once I've tried to port a package.
BTW, I get an exception when I click "Log in" on this page
You are right, somehow my ppa scripts got messed up and submitted 5.3 instead
of 5.3.1.
On 11/08/2012 05:41 AM, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:20:09PM -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>> Ok I think I found the issue. Commit
>> 1e375bab48f3d704bb2beeade77d05a2a3a642de is not in stable.
the documentation, which I've uploaded a copy of here:
>>
>> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/20121108-pkgs/planet2/index.html
>>
>> In particular, it explains what the plan is to go from this beta release
>> to the final release.
>>
>> If you currentl
h I've uploaded a copy of here:
>
> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/20121108-pkgs/planet2/index.html
>
> In particular, it explains what the plan is to go from this beta release
> to the final release.
>
> If you currently have packages on Planet 1, I am excited to help you
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release of
> Planet 2 to the Racket core.
Here, as promised, more detailed but small comments. I have one
larger design issue, which I want to write up in a separate mail.
* I
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 06:16 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
>> Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta
>> release of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
>>
>
> I just read the docs. This is friggin' awesome.
Quick comment: the install
On 11/08/2012 06:16 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta
release of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
I just read the docs. This is friggin' awesome.
Neil ⊥
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release
>> of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
>>
>> I've tried to answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2
>> in the documentation, which I've uploaded a copy of here:
>>
>> http://f
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 5 hours ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
> > Somewhat small change. But it was low-hanging fruit, and I needed
> > to make some kind of progress. :)
>
> Last time I benchmarked this kind of IO, using `write-string' and/or
> `write-bytes' was even fast
answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2
> in the documentation, which I've uploaded a copy of here:
>
> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/20121108-pkgs/planet2/index.html
>
> In particular, it explains what the plan is to go from this beta release
> to the final rel
At Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:20:33 +0100, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:55:21 +0100, Matthew Flatt
> wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
> > It's interesting that you can make that work in the current
> > implementation, but I worry about guaranteeing that order for the
> > future. I'm inclined instead
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:55:21 +0100, Matthew Flatt
wrote:
[ ... ]
It's interesting that you can make that work in the current
implementation, but I worry about guaranteeing that order for the
future. I'm inclined instead to say that the above declaration should
have signaled an error due to an
At Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:00:51 +0100, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> i am currently playing around with properties attached to cstructs and ran
> into some problems.
>
> Normally, with racket structs, i can access a property without an instance
> of the struct via the struct type descriptor (struct:S). T
; wrote:
> Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release
> of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
>
> I've tried to answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2
> in the documentation, which I've uploaded a copy of here:
>
2 to the Racket core.
>
> I've tried to answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2
> in the documentation, which I've uploaded a copy of here:
>
> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/20121108-pkgs/planet2/index.html
>
> In particular, it explains wha
Now that the 5.3.1 release is finished, I've just pushed the beta release
of Planet 2 to the Racket core.
I've tried to answer all questions and explain everything about Planet 2 in
the documentation, which I've uploaded a copy of here:
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay/tmp/201211
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:20:09PM -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Ok I think I found the issue. Commit 1e375bab48f3d704bb2beeade77d05a2a3a642de
> is not in stable. The commit is basically
>
> diff --git a/src/racket/gc2/sighand.c b/src/racket/gc2/sighand.c
> index c40aa09..b91ec7c 100644
> --- a/src
Hi,
Is there a reason that ffi/unsafe does not export ctype-scheme->c and
ctype-c->scheme?
Because I find them very useful in practice. Or should I avoid using them
for some reason?
Laurent
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Somehow I didn't register that the release is final.. so ok I guess this can
wait till the next release. No one is likely using 13.04 anyway.
On 11/07/2012 09:20 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Ok I think I found the issue. Commit 1e375bab48f3d704bb2beeade77d05a2a3a642de
> is not in stable. The commit
38 matches
Mail list logo
